Näppi Janne J, Regge Daniele, Yoshida Hiroyuki
Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 25 New Chardon Street, Suite 400C, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, IT-10060 Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011 Mar 4;7963. doi: 10.1117/12.878207.
Radiologists can outperform computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for CT colonography, because they consider not only local characteristics but also the context of findings. In particular, isolated findings are considered as more suspicious than clustered ones. We developed a computational method to model this problem-solving technique for reducing false-positive (FP) CAD detections in CT colonography. Lesion likelihood was estimated from shape and texture features of each candidate detection by use of a Bayesian neural network. Context features were calculated to characterize the distribution of candidate detections in a local neighborhood. A belief network was applied to detect isolated candidates at a higher sensitivity than clustered ones. The detection performances of the context-sensitive CAD and a conventional CAD were compared by use of leave-one-patient-out evaluation on 73 patients. Conventional CAD detected 82% of the lesions 6 - 9 mm in size with a median of 6 false positives per CT scan, whereas context-sensitive CAD detected the lesions at a median of 4 false positives with significant increment in overall detection performance. For lesions ≥10 mm in size, the detection sensitivity was 98% with a median of 7 false positives per patient, but the improvement in detection performance was not significant.
放射科医生在CT结肠成像方面的表现可能优于计算机辅助检测(CAD)系统,因为他们不仅考虑局部特征,还会考虑检查结果的背景情况。特别是,孤立的发现被认为比聚集的发现更可疑。我们开发了一种计算方法来模拟这种解决问题的技术,以减少CT结肠成像中计算机辅助检测的假阳性(FP)。通过使用贝叶斯神经网络,根据每个候选检测的形状和纹理特征估计病变可能性。计算上下文特征以表征局部邻域中候选检测的分布。应用信念网络以比聚集的候选检测更高的灵敏度检测孤立的候选检测。通过对73名患者进行留一法评估,比较了上下文敏感型CAD和传统CAD的检测性能。传统CAD检测出82%的6 - 9毫米大小的病变,每次CT扫描的假阳性中位数为6个,而上下文敏感型CAD检测出病变的假阳性中位数为4个,总体检测性能有显著提高。对于≥10毫米大小的病变,检测灵敏度为98%,每位患者的假阳性中位数为7个,但检测性能的改善并不显著。