Suppr超能文献

贝伐单抗治疗老年转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效和安全性:来自捷克人群登记处的结果。

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Czech population-based registry.

作者信息

Slavicek Lubomir, Pavlik Tomas, Tomasek Jiri, Bortlicek Zbynek, Buchler Tomas, Melichar Bohuslav, Vyzula Rostislav, Prausova Jana, Finek Jindrich, Majek Ondrej, Dusek Ladislav

机构信息

Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 25;14:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-53.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients aged 65 years and older represent the majority of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, this patient population is often underrepresented in clinical trials and probably undertreated in the clinical practice.

METHODS

We have analysed the outcomes of 3,187 mCRC patients treated with first-line bevacizumab based on data from the Czech national registry of mCRC patients aiming to compare the treatment efficacy and safety according to the age categories.

RESULTS

In total, 2,126 (66.7%), 932 (29.2%), and 129 (4.0%) patients were aged <65 years, 65 to 75 years, and 75+ years, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.4, 11.3, and 11.8 months for patients aged <65 years, 65 to 75 years, and 75+ years, respectively (p = 0.94). Median overall survival (OS) was 26.9, 27.5, and 25.1 months for patients aged <65 years, 65 to 75 years, and 75+ years, respectively (p = 0.73). Using multivariable Cox model for both PFS and OS, the patient age was not significantly associated with either PFS or OS. No increase in bevacizumab-related toxicity was observed among the elderly mCRC patients with the exception of hypertension, which was observed in 71 (3.3%), 34 (3.6%), and 10 (7.8%) patients aged <65 years, 65 to 75 years, and 75+ years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest similar outcome in terms of OS and PFS with bevacizumab-containing therapy in elderly mCRC patients fit for chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy compared to younger patients. Thus, chronological age should not be considered to represent a limitation in prescribing bevacizumab-containing therapy in mCRC patients.

摘要

背景

65岁及以上的患者占转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的大多数。然而,这一患者群体在临床试验中的代表性往往不足,在临床实践中可能也未得到充分治疗。

方法

我们基于捷克mCRC患者国家登记处的数据,分析了3187例接受一线贝伐单抗治疗的mCRC患者的结局,旨在根据年龄类别比较治疗效果和安全性。

结果

总共2126例(66.7%)、932例(29.2%)和129例(4.0%)患者年龄分别<65岁、65至75岁和75岁以上。年龄<65岁、65至75岁和75岁以上的患者中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为11.4个月、11.3个月和11.8个月(p = 0.94)。年龄<65岁、65至75岁和75岁以上的患者中位总生存期(OS)分别为26.9个月、27.5个月和25.1个月(p = 0.73)。使用多变量Cox模型分析PFS和OS,患者年龄与PFS或OS均无显著相关性。除高血压外,老年mCRC患者未观察到贝伐单抗相关毒性增加,年龄<65岁、65至75岁和75岁以上的患者中高血压发生率分别为71例(3.3%)、34例(3.6%)和10例(7.8%)。

结论

本研究结果表明,与年轻患者相比,适合化疗联合靶向治疗的老年mCRC患者接受含贝伐单抗治疗的OS和PFS结果相似。因此,不应将实际年龄视为mCRC患者开具含贝伐单抗治疗的限制因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbeb/3987650/19e49e54ee67/1471-230X-14-53-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验