Petrelli Fausto, Coinu Andrea, Cabiddu Mary, Borgonovo Karen, Lonati Veronica, Ghilardi Mara, Barni Sandro
Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio, Treviglio, BG, Italy,
Med Oncol. 2015 Feb;32(2):456. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0456-z. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
First-line chemotherapy + bevacizumab (BEV) is one of the standards of care in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Contrary to anti-EGFR agents, it is currently not possible to identify the ideal candidate for BEV-based chemotherapy due to the lack of predictors of outcomes. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of risk factors for survival after B-based chemotherapy for CRC. We performed a meta-analysis by searching on the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and SCOPUS for a published series that focused on prognostic factors for BEV-based therapy in advanced CRC. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by using a random-effects model for parameters that could be considered as potential prognostic factors in ≥3 papers. Twenty-nine studies, which included a total of 11,585 patients, were considered in this analysis. Five parameters were associated with survival in ≥3 papers: (1) a longer progression-free interval [PFS: HR 0.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.97; P = 0.01]; (2) a single site of metastases (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.56-0.71; P < 0.00001); (3) elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH: HR 2.08, 95 % CI 1.69-2.57; P < 0.00001); (4) KRAS mutation (HR 1.66, 95 % CI 1.36-2.03; P < 0.00001); and (5) poor performance status (PS: HR 1.99, 95 % CI 1.41-2.82; P < 0.0001). Clinical variables associated with prolonged survival, after first-line treatment with chemotherapy + BEV for metastatic CRC patients, included long PFS, low LDH levels, KRAS wild-type status, good PS and a single site of metastasis. They should be considered when stratifying patients for inclusion in randomized trials. Investigations into new prognostic factors based on tumor biology are needed and of high priority.
一线化疗联合贝伐单抗(BEV)是晚期结直肠癌(CRC)的标准治疗方案之一。与抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)药物不同,由于缺乏疗效预测指标,目前尚无法确定基于BEV化疗的理想候选患者。本研究旨在对CRC患者接受基于BEV化疗后的生存风险因素进行系统评价。我们通过检索PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和Scopus数据库,对已发表的一系列聚焦于晚期CRC患者基于BEV治疗的预后因素的研究进行荟萃分析。对于在≥3篇论文中可被视为潜在预后因素的参数,采用随机效应模型计算合并风险比(HR)。本分析纳入了29项研究,共11585例患者。5个参数在≥3篇论文中与生存相关:(1)无进展生存期较长[PFS:HR 0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.78 - 0.97;P = 0.01];(2)单一转移部位(HR 0.63,95% CI 0.56 - 0.71;P < 0.00001);(3)乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高(HR 2.08,95% CI 1.69 - 2.57;P < 0.00001);(4)KRAS突变(HR 1.66,95% CI 1.36 - 2.03;P < 0.00001);(5)体能状态差(PS:HR 1.99,95% CI 1.41 - 2.82;P < 0.0001)。转移性CRC患者接受一线化疗联合BEV治疗后,与生存期延长相关的临床变量包括较长的PFS、较低的LDH水平、KRAS野生型状态、良好的PS和单一转移部位。在对患者进行分层以纳入随机试验时应考虑这些因素。基于肿瘤生物学的新预后因素研究是必要的且具有高度优先性。