• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用最小限度正畸准备的正颌外科手术后稳定性评估:根据3种固定方式进行比较

Evaluation of stability after orthognathic surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation: comparison according to 3 types of fixation.

作者信息

Lee Ji-Young, Kim Young-Kyun, Yun Pil-Young, Lee Nam-Ki, Kim Jong-Wan, Choi Joon-Ho

机构信息

From the Departments of *Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and †School of Dentistry, Seoul National University; and ‡Orthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):911-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000609.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000000609
PMID:24670281
Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the patterns and amount of postsurgical relapse after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation. We also compared the stability of plate according to types. From January 2009 to February 2012, 26 patients (13 males, 13 females) at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were identified. All patients underwent presurgical orthodontic treatment in less than 6 months and had mandibular setback surgery. Lateral cephalograms were taken presurgically (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and 6 months after surgery (T2). To evaluate surgical change and surgical relapse, linear and angular measurements were performed, and results were analyzed. Comparison of the vertical and horizontal relapses between groups (group 1: sliding plate, group 2: conventional metal plate, group 3: resorbable plate) was also performed. The overall mandibular relapse was 2.80 (SD, 3.86) mm (pogonion) and 3.85 (SD, 4.44) mm (menton) anteriorly, and 1.2 (SD, 3.39) (pogonion) and 1.47 (SD, 3.48) mm (menton) superiorly. There was no significant difference among the 3 groups, however (P > 0.05). When mandibular setback surgery was performed, surgical relapse would occur anteriorly and superiorly. Significant difference can hardly be found among the 3 groups in terms of the amount of vertical and horizontal relapses.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在进行最少正畸准备的下颌后缩手术后的复发模式及复发量。我们还根据接骨板类型比较了接骨板的稳定性。2009年1月至2012年2月期间,首尔国立大学盆唐医院确定了26例患者(13例男性,13例女性)。所有患者均在不到6个月的时间内接受了术前正畸治疗并接受了下颌后缩手术。术前(T0)、术后即刻(T1)及术后6个月(T2)拍摄头颅侧位片。为评估手术变化及手术复发情况,进行了线性和角度测量,并对结果进行了分析。还对各分组(第1组:滑动接骨板,第2组:传统金属接骨板,第3组:可吸收接骨板)之间的垂直和水平复发情况进行了比较。下颌整体复发情况为:前向,颏前点处为2.80(标准差,3.86)mm,颏下点处为3.85(标准差,4.44)mm;向上,颏前点处为1.2(标准差,3.39)mm,颏下点处为1.47(标准差,3.48)mm。然而,3组之间并无显著差异(P>0.05)。进行下颌后缩手术时,手术复发会在前向和向上方向发生。在垂直和水平复发量方面,3组之间很难发现显著差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of stability after orthognathic surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation: comparison according to 3 types of fixation.采用最小限度正畸准备的正颌外科手术后稳定性评估:根据3种固定方式进行比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):911-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000609.
2
Postsurgical stability after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation following upper premolar extraction.上颌前磨牙拔除后进行最小限度正畸准备的下颌后缩手术后的术后稳定性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;71(11):1968.e1-1968.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
3
Evaluation of post-surgical relapse after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation.评价下颌后退术后经最小程度正畸准备的术后复发情况。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;41(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
4
Evaluation of skeletal and surgical factors related to relapse of mandibular setback surgery using the bioabsorbable plate.使用可吸收接骨板评估与下颌后缩手术复发相关的骨骼和手术因素。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009 Mar;37(2):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
5
Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment.使用口内垂直升支截骨术的正畸正颌外科手术与传统治疗方法的稳定性比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;74(3):610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
6
Comparison of the Stability After Mandibular Setback With Minimal Orthodontics of Class III Patients With Different Facial Types.不同面型Ⅲ类患者采用最小限度正畸下颌后缩术后稳定性的比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1464.e1-1464.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
7
Postsurgical Relapse in Class III Patients Treated With Two-Jaw Surgery: Conventional Three-Stage Method Versus Surgery-First Approach.双颌手术治疗Ⅲ类患者的术后复发:传统三阶段法与手术优先法的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Nov;26(8):2357-63. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001989.
8
Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.上颌和下颌联合手术后骨性III类错牙合的稳定性。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001 Fall;16(3):179-92.
9
Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.髁突矢状劈开截骨术后双侧可吸收皮质骨螺钉与钛钉固定下颌前突的骨稳定性比较研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
10
Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up.采用口内垂直升支截骨术的手术优先入路术后稳定性:12个月随访
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;52(6):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Mandibular Fixation Techniques Using Monocortical Plates After Mandibular Setback Surgery.下颌后缩手术后使用单皮质板的下颌固定技术评估
Life (Basel). 2025 May 23;15(6):845. doi: 10.3390/life15060845.
2
Impact of the lateral skeletal stability following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular asymmetry.双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术治疗下颌不对称后对侧方骨骼稳定性的影响
JPRAS Open. 2023 Aug 17;38:36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.08.006. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Clinical Stability of Bespoke Snowman Plates for Fixation following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy of the Mandible.
定制雪人钢板在下颌骨矢状劈开截骨术后固定的临床稳定性
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Aug 1;10(8):914. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080914.
4
Efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosyntheses in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.正颌外科中可吸收与钛金属骨内固定物的疗效和发病率:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2021 Oct;129(5):e12800. doi: 10.1111/eos.12800. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems.四种不同接骨板系统下颌后退术后髁突矢状位置变化的分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Oct 1;32(7):2441-2445. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007578.
6
Modern Surgery-First Approach Concept in Cleft-Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Cohort Study with 3D Quantitative Analysis of Surgical-Occlusion Setup.现代外科手术——唇腭裂正颌外科手术的首次入路概念:一项对手术咬合设置进行三维定量分析的比较队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 2;8(12):2116. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122116.
7
Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications.手术优先入路的现状(第二部分):注意事项与并发症
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jun 3;41(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40902-019-0206-4. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Finite Element Stress Analysis of Keyhole Plate System in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术中锁孔钢板系统的有限元应力分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 12;8(1):8971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27186-7.
9
Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative complications in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.正颌外科手术的术前、术中和术后并发症:一项系统综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jun;19(5):969-77. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1452-1. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
10
Bioabsorbable osteofixation for orthognathic surgery.正颌外科手术中的生物可吸收骨固定术。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb 19;37(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40902-015-0003-7. eCollection 2015 Dec.