aDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL bDepartment of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Curr Opin Urol. 2014 May;24(3):209-17. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000046.
Focal therapy for localised prostate cancer requires accurate disease localization and characterization. Standard trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy can miss significant cancer and cannot accurately localize prostate cancer to guide focal therapy. This article examines various biopsy and imaging strategies to determine which is the most useful in diagnosing prostate cancer suitable for treatment with focal therapy.
Advances in MRI and ultrasound have been combined with different biopsy techniques such as transperineal and targeted biopsy versus transrectal and whole-gland sampling to see which method detects and localizes cancer while reducing the burden of biopsy on patients.
Studies tended to report on overall cancer detection rates as opposed to clinically significant cancer detection rates. A standard definition of clinically significant cancer must first be defined and validated against an accurate sampling strategy such as radical prostatectomy or transperineal prostate mapping biopsy. Image-guided targeted biopsy has increased detection rates of clinically significant cancer rate with fewer number of cores compared with whole-gland sampling. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to identify a combined image and biopsy technique that detects and localizes the highest rate of clinically significant cancer while decreasing the risk to patients, in order to guide focal therapy.
局限性前列腺癌的局部治疗需要准确的疾病定位和特征描述。标准的经直肠超声活检可能会遗漏重要的癌症病灶,并且无法准确地将前列腺癌定位以指导局部治疗。本文探讨了各种活检和成像策略,以确定哪种方法最有助于诊断适合局部治疗的前列腺癌。
磁共振成像(MRI)和超声技术的进步已经与不同的活检技术相结合,如经会阴和靶向活检与经直肠和全腺取样,以观察哪种方法在减少活检对患者负担的同时能够检测和定位癌症。
研究倾向于报告整体癌症检出率,而不是临床显著癌症检出率。首先必须定义临床显著癌症的标准定义,并针对准确的采样策略(如根治性前列腺切除术或经会阴前列腺图谱活检)进行验证。与全腺取样相比,图像引导下的靶向活检可增加具有临床意义的癌症的检出率,同时减少核心数量。需要进一步的前瞻性随机对照试验来确定一种联合的影像学和活检技术,以检测和定位具有最高临床意义癌症的发生率,同时降低患者的风险,从而指导局部治疗。