Radford Ian J, Dickman Christopher R, Start Antony N, Palmer Carol, Carnes Karin, Everitt Corrin, Fairman Richard, Graham Gordon, Partridge Thalie, Thomson Allan
Division of Science and Conservation, Department of Parks and Wildlife, Kununurra, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092341. eCollection 2014.
We construct a state-and-transition model for mammals in tropical savannas in northern Australia to synthesize ecological knowledge and understand mammalian declines. We aimed to validate the existence of alternative mammal assemblage states similar to those in arid Australian grasslands, and to speculate on transition triggers. Based on the arid grassland model, we hypothesized that assemblages are partitioned across rainfall gradients and between substrates. We also predicted that assemblages typical of arid regions in boom periods would be prevalent in savannas with higher and more regular rainfall. Data from eight mammal surveys from the Kimberley region, Western Australia (1994 to 2011) were collated. Survey sites were partitioned across rainfall zones and habitats. Data allowed us to identify three assemblage states: State 0:--low numbers of mammals, State II:--dominated by omnivorous rodents and State III:--dominated by rodents and larger marsupials. Unlike arid grasslands, assemblage dominance by insectivorous dasyurids (State I) did not occur in savannas. Mammal assemblages were partitioned across rainfall zones and between substrates as predicted, but-unlike arid regions-were not related strongly to yearly rainfall. Mammal assemblage composition showed high regional stability, probably related to high annual rainfall and predictable wet season resource pulses. As a consequence, we speculate that perpetually booming assemblages in savannas allow top-down control of the ecosystem, with suppression of introduced cats by the dingo, the region's top predator. Under conditions of low or erratic productivity, imposed increasingly by intense fire regimes and introduced herbivore grazing, dingoes may not limit impacts of cats on native mammals. These interacting factors may explain contemporary declines of savanna mammals as well as historical declines in arid Australia. The cat-ecosystem productivity hypothesis raised here differs from the already-articulated cat-habitat structure hypothesis for mammal declines, and we suggest approaches for explicit testing of transition triggers for competing hypotheses.
我们构建了一个澳大利亚北部热带稀树草原哺乳动物的状态和转变模型,以整合生态知识并理解哺乳动物数量的减少。我们旨在验证类似于澳大利亚干旱草原的替代哺乳动物组合状态的存在,并推测转变触发因素。基于干旱草原模型,我们假设组合在降雨梯度和基质之间进行划分。我们还预测,干旱地区繁荣时期典型的组合在降雨更高且更规律的稀树草原中会占主导地位。整理了来自西澳大利亚金伯利地区八次哺乳动物调查(1994年至2011年)的数据。调查地点在降雨区和栖息地之间进行了划分。数据使我们能够识别出三种组合状态:状态0:哺乳动物数量少;状态II:以杂食性啮齿动物为主;状态III:以啮齿动物和较大的有袋动物为主。与干旱草原不同,食虫性袋鼬科动物占主导的组合(状态I)在稀树草原中未出现。哺乳动物组合如预测的那样在降雨区和基质之间进行了划分,但与干旱地区不同的是,与年降雨量的关系并不强烈。哺乳动物组合组成显示出较高的区域稳定性,可能与高年降雨量和可预测的湿季资源脉冲有关。因此,我们推测稀树草原中持续繁荣的组合允许对生态系统进行自上而下的控制,即该地区顶级捕食者澳洲野犬对引入的猫的抑制。在生产力低或不稳定的条件下,由于强烈的火灾制度和引入的食草动物放牧,澳洲野犬可能无法限制猫对本地哺乳动物的影响。这些相互作用的因素可能解释了稀树草原哺乳动物的当代数量减少以及澳大利亚干旱地区的历史数量减少。这里提出的猫 - 生态系统生产力假说与已经阐述的关于哺乳动物数量减少的猫 - 栖息地结构假说不同,我们建议了明确测试竞争假说转变触发因素的方法。