Suppr超能文献

氨氯地平和维拉帕米治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。

Comparison of amlodipine and verapamil in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Lorimer A R, Smedsrud T, Walker P, Tyler H M

机构信息

Department of Medical Cardiology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 7:S89-93. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198812007-00020.

Abstract

One hundred sixty patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension entered this double-blind parallel group comparison of amlodipine, verapamil, and placebo. Sixteen centers from the United Kingdom and Norway participated in this multicenter study. Administration of amlodipine (2.5 mg with adjustment to 5.0 mg and to 10.0 mg o.d.) or verapamil (80 mg b.i.d. titrating to 160 mg b.i.d.) for 8 weeks to patients with mild to moderate hypertension was associated with clinically important and statistically significant decreases in both supine and standing blood pressures. After 8 weeks of double-blind therapy, the mean (amlodipine-placebo) difference in the falls from baseline in blood pressures measured 24 h postdose were -11.9/-7.0 mm Hg (supine) and -11.4/-6.3 mm Hg (standing). The corresponding figures were -7.7/-4.6 mm Hg and 8.3/-4.0 mm Hg for verapamil (12 h postdose). Mean reductions from baseline of the amlodipine group exceeded those of the verapamil group by 2-4 mm Hg for all pressure measurements, and this difference was statistically significant for diastolic blood pressures. Responder rates were 72, 48, and 33% for amlodipine, verapamil, and placebo, respectively. Mean doses at 8 weeks were 9.1 mg (amlodipine) and 296 mg (verapamil). There were no significant changes in pulse rate. Both active drugs maintained their antihypertensive effect through the day (0-12 h postdose) with amlodipine showing a sustained 24-h effect. Twenty-two patients in the amlodipine, 19 in the verapamil, and 14 in the placebo groups had side effects possibly related to treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

160例轻至中度原发性高血压患者参与了氨氯地平、维拉帕米和安慰剂的双盲平行组对照研究。来自英国和挪威的16个中心参与了这项多中心研究。对轻至中度高血压患者给予氨氯地平(初始剂量2.5 mg,可调整至5.0 mg和10.0 mg每日一次)或维拉帕米(80 mg每日两次,滴定至160 mg每日两次)治疗8周,仰卧位和站立位血压均出现了具有临床意义且在统计学上有显著意义的下降。双盲治疗8周后,氨氯地平组与安慰剂组相比,给药后24小时测量的血压较基线下降的平均值为-11.9/-7.0 mmHg(仰卧位)和-11.4/-6.3 mmHg(站立位)。维拉帕米组(给药后12小时)相应的数据为-7.7/-4.6 mmHg和8.3/-4.0 mmHg。氨氯地平组所有血压测量值较基线的平均降幅比维拉帕米组超出2 - 4 mmHg,且舒张压差异具有统计学意义。氨氯地平、维拉帕米和安慰剂的有效率分别为72%、48%和33%。8周时的平均剂量分别为9.1 mg(氨氯地平)和296 mg(维拉帕米)。心率无显著变化。两种活性药物在一天内(给药后0 - 12小时)均维持其降压效果,氨氯地平显示出持续24小时的作用。氨氯地平组22例、维拉帕米组19例和安慰剂组14例患者出现了可能与治疗相关的副作用。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验