Fan Wei, Zhao Dong-bao, Hu Shao-xian, Xu Hu-ji, Zhang Xiao, Zhang Miu-jia, Chen Zhi-wei, Zhang Feng-xiao, Zhu Ping, Li Xin-fu, Bi Li-Qi, Zhou Bin, Bao Chun-de
Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 145 Middle Shandong Road, Shanghai, 200001, China.
Rheumatol Int. 2014 Nov;34(11):1519-27. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-2989-z. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
To assess the clinical efficacy as well as safety profiles of Leining, a novel cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 fusion protein, versus placebo in the treatment of Chinese active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate (MTX). In this 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study, a total of 440 Chinese patients with active RA with an inadequate response to MTX were randomly assigned to receive Leining (10 mg/kg) or placebo. Clinical response was assessed using the American College of Rheumatology 20 % improvement criteria ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, with ACR20 as the primary major endpoints. Disease activity scores in 28 joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate assessment (DAS28-ESR) were used to evaluate disease activity. After 24 weeks of treatment, significantly more patients in Leining group achieved ACR20 response than those in placebo group (70.61 vs. 46.36 %; p < 0.001). Similarly, ACR50 and ACR70 responses of Leining group were significantly higher than those of placebo group (40.30 vs. 22.73 %; p < 0.001 and 16.67 vs. 7.27 %; p < 0.05, respectively). DAS28-ESR in Leining group was significantly reduced compared to that in placebo group, with greater clinically meaningful (>1.2 unit) improvement (54.85 vs. 29.09 %, p < 0.05). Both the rates of remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) and low disease activity (DAS28-ESR < 3.2) were greater in the Leining group than those in the placebo group (12.42 vs. 2.73 %; p < 0.05 and 15.45 vs. 2.73 %; p < 0.05 respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both Leining and placebo groups. No neutralizing antibodies were detected. Leining demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy compared with placebo in Chinese patients with active RA despite MTX therapy. Administration of Leining in combination with MTX for 24 weeks was well tolerated.
评估新型细胞毒性T淋巴细胞抗原4融合蛋白(磊宁)对比安慰剂治疗对甲氨蝶呤(MTX)临床反应不佳的中国活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的临床疗效及安全性。在这项为期24周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照多中心研究中,共有440例对MTX反应不佳的中国活动性RA患者被随机分配接受磊宁(10 mg/kg)或安慰剂治疗。使用美国风湿病学会20%改善标准(ACR20、ACR50和ACR70)评估临床反应,以ACR20作为主要主要终点。采用28个关节疾病活动评分并结合红细胞沉降率评估(DAS28-ESR)来评估疾病活动度。治疗24周后,磊宁组达到ACR20反应的患者显著多于安慰剂组(70.61%对46.36%;p<0.001)。同样,磊宁组的ACR50和ACR70反应显著高于安慰剂组(分别为40.30%对22.73%;p<0.001和16.67%对7.27%;p<0.05)。与安慰剂组相比,磊宁组的DAS28-ESR显著降低,具有更大的临床意义(>1.2个单位)的改善(54.85%对29.09%,p<0.05)。磊宁组的缓解率(DAS28-ESR<2.6)和低疾病活动度率(DAS28-ESR<3.2)均高于安慰剂组(分别为12.42%对2.73%;p<0.05和15.45%对2.73%;p<0.05)。磊宁组和安慰剂组不良事件的总发生率相似。未检测到中和抗体。尽管接受了MTX治疗,但对于中国活动性RA患者,与安慰剂相比,磊宁显示出具有临床意义的疗效。联合MTX使用磊宁治疗24周耐受性良好。