• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[磁共振成像在直肠癌术前放化疗后再分期诊断准确性的Meta分析]

[Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance in restaging of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy].

作者信息

Huang Zhongming, Chu Lili, Zhao Risheng, Wang Hui

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;17(3):258-63.

PMID:24671815
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance(MR) in restaging of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy(CRT).

METHODS

Comprehensive search of literature concerning the diagnosis of MR for rectal cancer after preoperative CRT was performed from databases of PubMed, EMbase, OVID and WOK. Sensitivity and specificity of MR on restaging of rectal cancer after preoperative CRT were investigated by SAS and MetaDiSc software.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles including 749 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. For T3-T4 stage, sensitivity of MR was 82.1%(95%CI:67.9%-90.9%), specificity was 53.5%(95%CI:39.3%-67.3%), and diagnostic odds ratio(DOR) was 5.34(2.73, 6.59). For lymph node involvement, sensitivity of MR was 61.8%(95%CI:50.7%-71.8%), specificity was 72.0%(95%CI:61.3%-80.7%), and DOR was 4.33(95%CI:2.84-6.59). For circumferential resection margin(CRM) by MR, pooled sensitivity was 85.4%(95%CI:60.5%-95.7%), specificity was 80.0%(95%CI:57.4%-92.3%), and DOR was 27.62(95%CI:13.03-58.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Restaging accuracy of T3-T4 and lymph nodes involvement of rectal cancer after preoperative CRT by MR is not high. MR may be a good method to make reassessment of CRM. To avoid overtreatment for T0-T2, negative lymph node and circumferential resection of rectal cancer, restaging by MR after preoperative CRT is important.

摘要

目的

评估磁共振成像(MR)在术前放化疗(CRT)后直肠癌再分期中的诊断准确性。

方法

通过PubMed、EMbase、OVID和WOK数据库全面检索关于术前CRT后直肠癌MR诊断的文献。采用SAS和MetaDiSc软件研究MR对术前CRT后直肠癌再分期的敏感性和特异性。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入13篇文章,共749例患者。对于T3 - T4期,MR的敏感性为82.1%(95%CI:67.9% - 90.9%),特异性为53.5%(95%CI:39.3% - 67.3%),诊断比值比(DOR)为5.34(2.73,6.59)。对于淋巴结受累情况,MR的敏感性为61.8%(95%CI:50.7% - 71.8%),特异性为72.0%(95%CI:61.3% - 80.7%),DOR为4.33(95%CI:2.84 - 6.59)。对于MR评估的环周切缘(CRM),合并敏感性为85.4%(95%CI:60.5% - 95.7%),特异性为80.0%(95%CI:57.4% - 92.3%),DOR为27.62(95%CI:13.03 - 58.55)。

结论

术前CRT后,MR对直肠癌T3 - T4期及淋巴结受累情况的再分期准确性不高。MR可能是重新评估CRM的良好方法。为避免对T0 - T2期、淋巴结阴性及环周切缘阴性的直肠癌进行过度治疗,术前CRT后通过MR进行再分期很重要。

相似文献

1
[Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance in restaging of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy].[磁共振成像在直肠癌术前放化疗后再分期诊断准确性的Meta分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;17(3):258-63.
2
Prediction of pathologic staging with magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: pooled analysis of KROG 10-01 and 11-02.直肠癌术前放化疗后磁共振成像对病理分期的预测:KROG 10-01和11-02的汇总分析
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Oct;113(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
3
Restaging of locally advanced rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and endoluminal ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.术前放化疗后磁共振成像和腔内超声局部进展期直肠癌再分期:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):388-95. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000022.
4
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Restaging of Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.磁共振成像在术前放化疗后直肠癌再分期中的诊断准确性:一项Meta分析和系统评价
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Jan/Feb;44(1):102-110. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000964.
5
Patients who undergo preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer restaged by using diagnostic MR imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受术前放化疗的局部进展期直肠癌患者使用诊断性磁共振成像进行重新分期:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):101-12. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122833. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
6
Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic impact of restaging by magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.直肠癌患者术前放化疗后磁共振成像再分期的诊断准确性及预后影响
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Oct;113(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
7
Factors affecting the restaging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer.影响直肠癌患者术前放化疗后磁共振成像再分期准确性的因素。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;41(4):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.直肠内超声检查和高分辨率磁共振成像在新辅助放化疗后直肠癌再分期中的准确性。
Ann Ital Chir. 2018;89:168-176.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像在评估直肠癌 T 分期、淋巴结转移及环周切缘受侵的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul;19(7):2212-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI and endorectal ultrasound in the restaging and response assessment of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy.新辅助治疗后MRI和直肠内超声在直肠癌再分期及疗效评估中准确性的系统评价和Meta分析
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;17(9):748-61. doi: 10.1111/codi.12976.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging of rectal cancer.直肠癌的影像学检查
Radiologe. 2019 Dec;59(Suppl 1):46-50. doi: 10.1007/s00117-019-0579-5.
2
[Imaging of rectal cancer. German version].[直肠癌的影像学检查。德文版]
Radiologe. 2019 Sep;59(9):799-803. doi: 10.1007/s00117-019-0576-8.
3
Can CRM Status on MRI Predict Survival in Rectal Cancers: Experience from the Indian Subcontinent.MRI上的CRM状态能否预测直肠癌的生存率:来自印度次大陆的经验。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;10(2):364-371. doi: 10.1007/s13193-019-00894-w. Epub 2019 Feb 21.