Suppr超能文献

[磁共振成像在直肠癌术前放化疗后再分期诊断准确性的Meta分析]

[Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance in restaging of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy].

作者信息

Huang Zhongming, Chu Lili, Zhao Risheng, Wang Hui

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;17(3):258-63.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance(MR) in restaging of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy(CRT).

METHODS

Comprehensive search of literature concerning the diagnosis of MR for rectal cancer after preoperative CRT was performed from databases of PubMed, EMbase, OVID and WOK. Sensitivity and specificity of MR on restaging of rectal cancer after preoperative CRT were investigated by SAS and MetaDiSc software.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles including 749 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. For T3-T4 stage, sensitivity of MR was 82.1%(95%CI:67.9%-90.9%), specificity was 53.5%(95%CI:39.3%-67.3%), and diagnostic odds ratio(DOR) was 5.34(2.73, 6.59). For lymph node involvement, sensitivity of MR was 61.8%(95%CI:50.7%-71.8%), specificity was 72.0%(95%CI:61.3%-80.7%), and DOR was 4.33(95%CI:2.84-6.59). For circumferential resection margin(CRM) by MR, pooled sensitivity was 85.4%(95%CI:60.5%-95.7%), specificity was 80.0%(95%CI:57.4%-92.3%), and DOR was 27.62(95%CI:13.03-58.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Restaging accuracy of T3-T4 and lymph nodes involvement of rectal cancer after preoperative CRT by MR is not high. MR may be a good method to make reassessment of CRM. To avoid overtreatment for T0-T2, negative lymph node and circumferential resection of rectal cancer, restaging by MR after preoperative CRT is important.

摘要

目的

评估磁共振成像(MR)在术前放化疗(CRT)后直肠癌再分期中的诊断准确性。

方法

通过PubMed、EMbase、OVID和WOK数据库全面检索关于术前CRT后直肠癌MR诊断的文献。采用SAS和MetaDiSc软件研究MR对术前CRT后直肠癌再分期的敏感性和特异性。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入13篇文章,共749例患者。对于T3 - T4期,MR的敏感性为82.1%(95%CI:67.9% - 90.9%),特异性为53.5%(95%CI:39.3% - 67.3%),诊断比值比(DOR)为5.34(2.73,6.59)。对于淋巴结受累情况,MR的敏感性为61.8%(95%CI:50.7% - 71.8%),特异性为72.0%(95%CI:61.3% - 80.7%),DOR为4.33(95%CI:2.84 - 6.59)。对于MR评估的环周切缘(CRM),合并敏感性为85.4%(95%CI:60.5% - 95.7%),特异性为80.0%(95%CI:57.4% - 92.3%),DOR为27.62(95%CI:13.03 - 58.55)。

结论

术前CRT后,MR对直肠癌T3 - T4期及淋巴结受累情况的再分期准确性不高。MR可能是重新评估CRM的良好方法。为避免对T0 - T2期、淋巴结阴性及环周切缘阴性的直肠癌进行过度治疗,术前CRT后通过MR进行再分期很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验