Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Endoscopy. 2014 Apr;46(4):291-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358909. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
The combination of midazolam and opioid has been widely used as a standard sedative regimen for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Following recent evidence that dexmedetomidine may exert a synergistic effect in combination with midazolam, this study compared the sedative effect and adverse events of midazolam - meperidine - dexmedetomidine (MMD) and midazolam - meperidine during ERCP.
A total of 110 patients who were scheduled for ERCP were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to the MMD (n = 53) or midazolam - meperidine (n = 57) groups. Each patient received an intravenous (IV) bolus dose of midazolam and meperidine (0.06 mg/kg and 50 mg, 30 % reduction and 25 mg for patients aged ≥ 65 years, respectively). To this dose, a continuous IV infusion of dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg/h; MMD group) or the same volume of normal saline (midazolam - meperidine group) was added. The sedation level (Ramsay Sedation Scale [RSS]) as well as hemodynamic and respiratory changes were assessed.
Adequate sedation (RSS ≥ 3) was maintained during ERCP in 75.5 % and 36.8 % of the MMD and midazolam - meperidine group, respectively (P < 0.001). RSS scores were significantly higher in the MMD group (P < 0.001). Intraoperative bispectral index scores were significantly lower in the MMD group (P < 0.001) than in the midazolam - meperidine group. Lower additional (P = 0.001) and total (P = 0.003) doses of midazolam were required in the MMD group. Patients in the MMD group showed lower pain scores (P < 0.001) and higher satisfaction scores (P < 0.001). Desaturation occurred more frequently in the midazolam - meperidine group (11 vs. 1; P = 0.003).
The addition of dexmedetomidine to the midazolam - meperidine regimen provided better sedative efficacy and a superior safety profile during ERCP compared with a midazolam - meperidine regimen.This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT01404689).
咪达唑仑联合阿片类药物已广泛用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的标准镇静方案。最近有证据表明右美托咪定与咪达唑仑联合可能具有协同作用,本研究比较了咪达唑仑-哌替啶-右美托咪定(MMD)与 ERCP 期间咪达唑仑-哌替啶镇静的效果和不良反应。
共纳入 110 例行 ERCP 的患者,前瞻性随机分为 MMD 组(n = 53)和咪达唑仑-哌替啶组(n = 57),两组患者均接受咪达唑仑和哌替啶静脉推注(0.06 mg/kg 和 50 mg,年龄≥65 岁患者分别减少 30%和 25%)。在此剂量基础上,MMD 组给予右美托咪定持续静脉输注(1 μg/kg/h),咪达唑仑-哌替啶组给予相同容量生理盐水。评估镇静水平(Ramsay 镇静评分[RSS])以及血流动力学和呼吸变化。
MMD 组和咪达唑仑-哌替啶组分别有 75.5%和 36.8%的患者在 ERCP 期间维持足够的镇静(RSS≥3)(P < 0.001)。MMD 组的 RSS 评分明显更高(P < 0.001)。MMD 组术中双谱指数评分明显低于咪达唑仑-哌替啶组(P < 0.001)。MMD 组需要的咪达唑仑额外(P = 0.001)和总剂量(P = 0.003)均较低。MMD 组患者疼痛评分较低(P < 0.001),满意度评分较高(P < 0.001)。咪达唑仑-哌替啶组发生脱氧血症的频率更高(11 例比 1 例;P = 0.003)。
与咪达唑仑-哌替啶方案相比,在 ERCP 期间,咪达唑仑-右美托咪定方案联合右美托咪定可提供更好的镇静效果和更安全的疗效。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT01404689)。