Tuluce Kamil, Ozerkan Filiz, Yakar Tuluce Selcen, Yavuzgil Oguz, Gurgun Cemil, Bilgin Murat, Kahya Eren Nihan, Kocabas Ugur, Nalbantgil Sanem, Soydas Cinar Cahide
Department of Cardiology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Cardiol J. 2015;22(1):94-100. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0025. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
We evaluated the associations among the well-known atrial fibrillation (AF) predictors including P-wave dispersion (PWD), intra- and inter-atrial electromechanical dyssynchrony (EMD), left atrial (LA) phasic functions, and plasma N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Seventy patients with HCM and age and sex matched 70 subjects were enrolled. PWD, LA total emptying fraction (LATEFr), active emptying fraction (LAAEFr), passive emptying fraction (LAPEFr), expansion index (LAEI) intra- and inter-atrial EMD were calculated. Levels of NT-proBNP of all subjects were determined.
Higher PWD (p = 0.006), significantly decreased LAEI (p < 0.001), LATEFr, and LAPEFr (both p values < 0.001) values and significantly increased inter-atrial (p < 0.001), LA (p = 0.001), and right atrial dyssynchrony (p < 0.001) were observed in the HCM group compared to controls. PWD was negatively correlated with LAEI (r = -0.236, p = 0.005) and LATEFr (r = -0.242, p = 0.04), however not with LAPEFr (p = 0.7), or LAAEFr (p = 0.3). Except for the LA lateral wall PA' (r = 0.283, p = 0.02), PWD was not correlated with any atrial EMD parameter. Inter-atrial dyssynchrony was related to LAEI (r = -0.272, p = 0.001), LATEFr (r = -0.256, p = 0.03), and LAPEFr (r = -0.332, p = 0.006), but not, however, to LAAEFr (p = 0.4). The plasma NT-proBNP levels of patients were not correlated with either PWD (p = 0.927) or inter-atrial dyssynchrony (p = 0.102).
PWD and inter-atrial dysynchrony seem to independently promote AF, although both are associated with LA reservoir function in HCM populations. The NT-proBNP level is not associated with these two AF predictors in patients with HCM. NT-proBNP seems to be a poor marker of atrial electrical remodeling in HCM patients.
我们评估了肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者中包括P波离散度(PWD)、心房内和心房间电机械不同步(EMD)、左心房(LA)阶段性功能以及血浆B型利钠肽前体N末端(NT-proBNP)水平等著名心房颤动(AF)预测指标之间的关联。
纳入70例HCM患者以及年龄和性别匹配的70名受试者。计算PWD、LA总排空分数(LATEFr)、主动排空分数(LAAEFr)、被动排空分数(LAPEFr)、扩张指数(LAEI)、心房内和心房间EMD。测定所有受试者的NT-proBNP水平。
与对照组相比,HCM组观察到更高的PWD(p = 0.006)、显著降低 的LAEI(p < 0.001)、LATEFr和LAPEFr(p值均< 0.001)值,以及显著增加的心房间(p < 0.001)、LA(p = 0.001)和右心房不同步(p < 0.001)。PWD与LAEI(r = -0.236,p = 当0.005)和LATEFr(r = -0.242,p = 0.04)呈负相关,但与LAPEFr(p = 0.7)或LAAEFr(p = 0.3)无关。除LA侧壁PA'外(r = 0.283,p = 0.02),PWD与任何心房EMD参数均无相关性。心房间不同步与LAEI(r = -0.272,p = 0.001)、LATEFr(r = -0.256,p = 0.03)和LAPEFr(r = -0.332,p = 0.006)相关,但与LAAEFr无关(p = 0.4)。患者的血浆NT-proBNP水平与PWD(p = 0.927)或心房间不同步(p = 0.102)均无相关性。
PWD和心房间不同步似乎独立促进AF,尽管两者在HCM人群中均与LA储器功能相关。NT-proBNP水平在HCM患者中与这两个AF预测指标无关。NT-proBNP似乎是HCM患者心房电重构的一个不良标志物。