Suppr超能文献

急诊医生对床旁超声心动图射血分数的视觉评估。

Visual estimation of bedside echocardiographic ejection fraction by emergency physicians.

作者信息

Unlüer Erden E, Karagöz Arif, Akoğlu Haldun, Bayata Serdar

机构信息

Izmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Research and Training Hospital, Turkey.

Kartal Lütfi Kırdar Research and Training Hospital, Turkey.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;15(2):221-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.9.16185.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to determine whether bedside visual estimates of left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) by emergency physicians (EP) would agree with quantitative measurement of LVSF by the modified Simpson's method (MSM), as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography.

METHODS

After limited focused training, 2 trained EPs performed bedside echocardiography (BECH) procedures s between January and June 2012 to prospectively evaluate patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dyspnea. EPs categorized their visually estimated ejection fractions (VEF) as either low or normal. Formal echocardiography were ordered and performed by an experienced cardiologist using the MSM and accepted as the criterion standard. We compared BECH results for each EP using chi-squared testing and performed correlation analysis by Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Of the 146 enrolled patients with dyspnea, 13 were excluded and 133 were included in the study. Comparison of EPs vs. cardiologist's estimate of ejection fraction yielded a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.77 (R, p<0.0001) and 0.78 (R, p<0.0001). Calculated biserial correlations using point-biserial correlation and z-scores were 1 (rb, p<0.0001) for both EPs. The agreement between EPs and the cardiologist was 0.861 and 0.876, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the positive and negative likelihood ratios for each physician were 98.7-98.7%, 86.2-87.9%, 0.902-0.914, 0.980-0.981, 7.153-8.175, 0.015-0.015, respectively.

CONCLUSION

EPs with a focused training in limited BECH can assess LVSF accurately in the ED by visual estimation.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是确定急诊科医生(EP)通过床旁视觉评估左心室收缩功能(LVSF)是否与美国超声心动图学会推荐的改良Simpson法(MSM)对LVSF的定量测量结果一致。

方法

在接受有限的集中培训后,2名经过培训的急诊科医生在2012年1月至6月期间进行床旁超声心动图(BECH)检查,以对因呼吸困难就诊于急诊科(ED)的患者进行前瞻性评估。急诊科医生将他们视觉估计的射血分数(VEF)分为低或正常。由经验丰富的心脏病专家使用MSM进行正式的超声心动图检查,并将其作为标准参照。我们使用卡方检验比较了每位急诊科医生的BECH结果,并通过Pearson相关系数进行相关性分析。

结果

在146名纳入研究的呼吸困难患者中,13名被排除,133名被纳入研究。急诊科医生与心脏病专家对射血分数的估计比较,Pearson相关系数分别为0.77(R,p<0.0001)和0.78(R,p<0.0001)。两名急诊科医生使用点二列相关和z分数计算的双列相关均为1(rb,p<0.0001)。急诊科医生与心脏病专家之间的一致性分别为0.861和0.8

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/3966449/1815d72bbdd2/wjem-15-221-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验