Izmir Ataturk Research and Training Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(1):18-22. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834f835a.
We aimed to assess the suitability of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) fractional shortening for estimating low central venous pressure (CVP). To the best of our knowledge, there have been no similar studies in the English language literature.
In this cross-sectional study, the emergency physicians measured the RVOT fractional shortening on parasternal short-axis view. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to identify the threshold that maximized the sensitivity and specificity for discriminating normal and low CVPs by the RVOT fractional shortening value. The sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and the negative likelihood ratios of RVOT fractional shortening to truly estimate CVP were calculated.
Fifty-eight consecutive patients had invasive CVP monitoring. Nine patients with high CVP and eight for other reasons were excluded. Forty-one patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 21 were in low CVP group and 20 were in normal CVP group. RVOT diastolic diameters, RVOT systolic diameters, and RVOT fractional shortening were lower in low CVP group and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The cutoff value for RVOT fractional shortening to differentiate the low and normal CVPs using the highest sensitivity and specificity was 26.44%. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.933 (0.810-0.987) with a P value of less than 0.001. The sensitivity and specificity of RVOT fractional shortening to truly estimate CVP were 95 (75-99) and 80% (58-94), respectively.
In the hands of emergency physicians, a RVOT fractional shortening measurement is a good predictor of low CVP.
我们旨在评估右心室流出道(RVOT)分数缩短率评估低中心静脉压(CVP)的适用性。据我们所知,在英文文献中尚无类似的研究。
在这项横断面研究中,急诊医师在胸骨旁短轴视图上测量 RVOT 分数缩短率。通过接受者操作特征曲线分析,确定 RVOT 分数缩短率的阈值,该阈值可最大程度地提高对正常和低 CVP 的区分敏感性和特异性。计算 RVOT 分数缩短率真实估计 CVP 的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性似然比。
连续 58 例患者进行了有创性 CVP 监测。排除了 9 例高 CVP 患者和 8 例其他原因患者。共有 41 例患者入组研究,其中 21 例患者为低 CVP 组,20 例患者为正常 CVP 组。低 CVP 组的 RVOT 舒张直径、RVOT 收缩直径和 RVOT 分数缩短率均较低,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。RVOT 分数缩短率区分低和正常 CVP 的最佳敏感性和特异性截断值为 26.44%。接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.933(0.810-0.987),P 值小于 0.001。RVOT 分数缩短率真实估计 CVP 的敏感性和特异性分别为 95%(75-99)和 80%(58-94)。
在急诊医师手中,RVOT 分数缩短率测量是低 CVP 的良好预测指标。