Suppr超能文献

[多学科咬痕分析中的问题成因]

[Causes of problems in multidisciplinary bitemark analysis].

作者信息

Przystańska Agnieszka, Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska Dorota, Glapiński Mariusz, Swiderski Paweł, Łabecka Marzena, Zaba Czesław

出版信息

Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2013 Jul-Sep;63(3):220-5.

Abstract

Since a successful bitemark analysis depends on many factors, it is important that the phases preceding the analysis be carried out as thoroughly as possible. Interpretive errors in the analysis arise primarily from the complex nature of bitemarks, but also as a result of faulty research methodology, false assumptions or technical errors made during the identification and documentation process. The key role is played by qualifications, knowledge and experience of experts involved in the investigations. In case bitemarks are detected, it is recommended to seek consultations by forensic odontologists or members of an interdisciplinary team experienced in bitemark analysis. The thus obtained information allows for gathering evidence guaranteeing a reliable expert opinion.

摘要

由于成功的咬痕分析取决于许多因素,因此在分析之前的各个阶段都应尽可能彻底地进行,这一点很重要。分析中的解释性错误主要源于咬痕的复杂性质,但也可能是由于研究方法不当、错误假设或在识别和记录过程中出现的技术错误所致。参与调查的专家的资质、知识和经验起着关键作用。如果发现咬痕,建议向法医牙科学专家或在咬痕分析方面有经验的跨学科团队成员寻求咨询。由此获得的信息有助于收集证据,确保专家意见可靠。

相似文献

2
Expert disagreement in bitemark casework.咬痕鉴定工作中的专家分歧。
J Forensic Sci. 2009 Jul;54(4):915-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01073.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
5
The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis.实现咬痕分析证据基础的障碍。
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 May 15;159 Suppl 1:S110-20. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.033. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
9
Forensic dentistry: 2. Bitemarks and bite injuries.法医牙科学:2. 咬痕与咬伤
Dent Update. 2008 Jan-Feb;35(1):48-50, 53-4, 57-8 passim. doi: 10.12968/denu.2008.35.1.48.
10
Bitemarks in forensic odontology.法医牙科学中的咬痕
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1998 Dec;16(2):30-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验