• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结清扫对尿路上皮癌患者预后的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Effect of lymph node dissection on the outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinomas: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University , 222 Zhong Shan Road, Dalian, Liaoning 116011 , P.R. China.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014 Jun;14(6):667-75. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2014.895670. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1586/14737140.2014.895670
PMID:24673605
Abstract

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library. 6032 patients were included. There was no significant difference in survival between LND and NLND (non-lymph node dissection) among the patients. However, the patients in the LND group had more advanced tumour stages and grades (p < 0.001). In addition, among the muscle-invasive patients, LND demonstrated remarkable CSS improvement compared with NLND (HR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.26-3.80; p = 0.005). Moreover, subgroup analyses found that patients with muscle-invasive UTUC had better CSS (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.02-1.45; p < 0.001) than those patients with pN0 compared to pNx (NLND). In terms of RFS, the results showed no difference in the survival rates between pN0 and pNx patients in the subgroup of patients with muscle-invasive UTUC (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.84-2.23; p = 0.19). Our meta-analysis supports that LND may prolong the CSS and RFS of UTUC, especially for patients with muscle-invasive UTUC.

摘要

系统检索了 PubMed 和 Cochrane Library,共纳入 6032 例患者。LND 组和 NLND 组(非淋巴结清扫术)患者的生存无显著差异。然而,LND 组患者的肿瘤分期和分级更高(p<0.001)。此外,在肌层浸润性患者中,与 NLND 相比,LND 可显著改善 CSS(HR:2.19;95%CI:1.26-3.80;p=0.005)。此外,亚组分析发现,与 pNx(NLND)相比,肌层浸润性 UTUC 患者的 CSS 更好(HR:1.22;95%CI:1.02-1.45;p<0.001)。在 RFS 方面,结果显示肌层浸润性 UTUC 患者亚组中 pN0 和 pNx 患者的生存率无差异(HR:1.40;95%CI:0.84-2.23;p=0.19)。本 meta 分析支持 LND 可能延长 UTUC 的 CSS 和 RFS,特别是对肌层浸润性 UTUC 患者。

相似文献

1
Effect of lymph node dissection on the outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinomas: a meta-analysis.淋巴结清扫对尿路上皮癌患者预后的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014 Jun;14(6):667-75. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2014.895670. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
2
Impact of lymph node dissection on cancer specific survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy.淋巴结清扫术对接受根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者癌症特异性生存的影响。
J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
3
Contemporary role of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌时淋巴结清扫的当代作用。
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):535-548. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1764-z. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
4
Prognostic value of lymph node dissection in patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.淋巴结清扫在上尿路肌层浸润性移行细胞癌患者中的预后价值。
Eur Urol. 2008 Apr;53(4):794-802. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
5
Impact of lymphovascular invasion on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌患者的淋巴血管侵犯对肿瘤学结果的影响。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(8):1199-207. doi: 10.1111/bju.12116. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
Role of lymph node dissection in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinomas: a meta-analysis.淋巴结清扫在上尿路尿路上皮癌治疗中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0336-5.
7
The emerging role of lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.淋巴结切除术在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的新作用。
Urol Clin North Am. 2011 Nov;38(4):429-37, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
8
Comparison of oncological outcomes after segmental ureterectomy or radical nephroureterectomy in urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract: results from a large French multicentre study.比较上尿路尿路上皮癌行节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项来自法国大型多中心研究的结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8):1134-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10960.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
9
Association between lymph node yield and survival among patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract.上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术患者的淋巴结获取数量与生存率之间的关联。
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(10):1741-1750. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30516. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
10
Does lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy affect oncological outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients without suspicious lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging studies?在术前影像学检查未发现可疑淋巴结转移的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中,肾输尿管切除术期间进行淋巴结清扫是否会影响肿瘤学结局?
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):665-673. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1918-z. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives.上尿路尿路上皮癌的淋巴结清扫术:现状与未来展望。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1327-1344. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
2
Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.比较手辅助、腹腔镜和机器人肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局和手术并发症。
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 4;11:731460. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731460. eCollection 2021.
3
The nephroureterectomy: a review of technique and current controversies.
肾输尿管切除术:技术回顾与当前争议
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):3168-3190. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.07.
4
Development and external validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting pathological locally advanced disease of clinically localized upper urinary tract carcinoma.开发和外部验证用于预测临床局限性上尿路上皮癌局部晚期疾病的术前列线图。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jun;9(11):3733-3741. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2988. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review.质子束治疗肾盂和输尿管癌:5例报告及文献综述
Mol Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul;11(1):24-30. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1861. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: current perspectives.机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术:当前观点
Robot Surg. 2016 Jul 4;3:37-48. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S106792. eCollection 2016.
7
Current Status of Lymphadenectomy During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer-Yes, No or Maybe?上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术中淋巴结清扫的现状——是、否还是也许?
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;9(3):418-426. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0807-x. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
8
Trends of lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的淋巴结清扫趋势。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1541-1547. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2026-4. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
Current role of lymphadenectomy in the upper tract urothelial carcinoma.淋巴结清扫术在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的当前作用。
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(4):384-390. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.834. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
10
Does lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy affect oncological outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients without suspicious lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging studies?在术前影像学检查未发现可疑淋巴结转移的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中,肾输尿管切除术期间进行淋巴结清扫是否会影响肿瘤学结局?
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):665-673. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1918-z. Epub 2016 Aug 8.