• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿曼的乳腺钼靶检查表现:影响癌症检出率和阳性预测值的因素综述

Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.

作者信息

Taif Sawsan, Tufail Fatma, Alnuaimi Ahmed Sameer

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Khoula Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

Department of Community Medicine, Baghdad College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;12(2):e250-8. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12181. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1111/ajco.12181
PMID:24673798
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess mammography performance in Oman by estimating the breast cancer rate and the positive predictive value (PPV) with the influence of some variables.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on mammograms done in one of the three main breast imaging centers in Oman between January 2008 and July 2012. Diagnostic and screening groups were identified and assessed separately. Rate of abnormal mammograms, rate of breast cancer and the PPV were estimated according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) score, presence of breast lump and patient's age.

RESULTS

Total of 653 mammograms were included, 254 diagnostic and 399 screening. Abnormal mammograms (BIRADS 4 and 5) form 31.9% of the diagnostic examinations compared with 6.8% of screening examinations. Breast cancer was present in 17.9% of the diagnostic compared with 1.0% of the screening group. The PPV of BIRADS 5 was 94.1%, and for BIRADS 4 was 37.1 and 26.7% for diagnostic and screening studies. Overall PPV for abnormal mammograms was 65.2% in the diagnostic and 26.7% in the screening group. Mammography PPV shows positive association with age (P = 0.039) while presence of breast lump has no significant effect on the PPV (P = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

BIRADS 5 score was found to have a high cancer yield making it a strong predictor of cancer. Different results were obtained in the diagnostic compared with screening mammography with higher rates of abnormal mammograms and breast cancer. Mammography performance should be better in the older women.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过估计乳腺癌发病率和阳性预测值(PPV),并考虑一些变量的影响,评估阿曼的乳房X线摄影性能。

方法

本横断面研究对2008年1月至2012年7月在阿曼三个主要乳房成像中心之一进行的乳房X线摄影进行。分别识别和评估诊断组和筛查组。根据乳房影像报告和数据系统(BIRADS)评分、乳房肿块的存在情况和患者年龄,估计乳房X线摄影异常率、乳腺癌发病率和PPV。

结果

共纳入653例乳房X线摄影,其中254例为诊断性检查,399例为筛查性检查。诊断性检查中异常乳房X线摄影(BIRADS 4和5)占31.9%,而筛查性检查中占6.8%。诊断组中乳腺癌占17.9%,而筛查组中占1.0%。BIRADS 5的PPV为94.1%,BIRADS 4在诊断性研究和筛查性研究中的PPV分别为37.1%和26.7%。诊断组中异常乳房X线摄影的总体PPV为65.2%,筛查组中为26.7%。乳房X线摄影PPV与年龄呈正相关(P = 0.039),而乳房肿块的存在对PPV无显著影响(P = 0.38)。

结论

发现BIRADS 5评分具有较高的癌症检出率,使其成为癌症的有力预测指标。诊断性乳房X线摄影与筛查性乳房X线摄影的结果不同,异常乳房X线摄影和乳腺癌的发生率更高。老年女性乳房X线摄影性能应该更好。

相似文献

1
Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.阿曼的乳腺钼靶检查表现:影响癌症检出率和阳性预测值的因素综述
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;12(2):e250-8. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12181. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
2
The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目:为医疗服务不足的女性提供的前4年乳房X光检查报告。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jan;170(1):97-104. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.1.9423608.
3
International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.社区项目中乳腺钼靶筛查解读的国际差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 17;95(18):1384-93. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg048.
4
Audit of mammography requests in Abakaliki, South-East Nigeria.尼日利亚东南部阿巴卡利基乳房X光检查申请审计
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar 7;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1122-7.
5
Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.按年龄和乳腺癌家族史划分的乳腺钼靶筛查的阳性预测值
JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2444-50.
6
National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.现代诊断性数字乳腺摄影国家性能基准:乳腺癌监测联盟的更新
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):59-69. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161519. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?乳腺钼靶密度:它如何影响筛查项目中的性能指标?
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan;110:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
8
Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.40 岁以下女性首次乳房 X 光检查的表现。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 19;102(10):692-701. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq090. Epub 2010 May 3.
9
Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.社区实践中的乳腺钼靶筛查:异常结果的阳性预测值及后续诊断程序的产出
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1373-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484568.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Metrics of Mammography Screening Programmes in Primary Health Care Centres in Bahrain.巴林初级卫生保健中心乳腺钼靶筛查项目的绩效指标
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Aug 18;17:2583-2593. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S535787. eCollection 2025.