Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Oct-Dec;3(4):e157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
Novel techniques to deliver intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have resulted in improved treatment efficiency and dosimetric endpoints. We aimed to compare acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the prostate (ACP) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
A total of 122 (71 IMRT and 51 VMAT) ACP patients treated from 2004 to 2011 with definitive external beam radiation therapy were analyzed. Dose-volume histogram endpoints (V40, V65, V70, and V75 of the bladder and rectum) were collected for each patient. Median follow-up for patients treated with VMAT was 269 days versus IMRT was 1121 days. Acute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GI and GU toxicity scores, obtained during each weekly treatment check, were compared across cohorts. The univariate (UV) association between the covariates and outcomes was assessed and multivariable (MV) cumulative logit models were fit for each outcome.
Median patient age was 68 years and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.3. Both bladder and rectal V40, V65, V70, and V75 were all higher in the IMRT group versus the VMAT group (P < .05), which was likely influenced by larger planning target volumes in the IMRT group. The VMAT group had significantly lower rates of acute GU and acute GI CTCAE toxicity on UV association analysis. On MV analysis, VMAT remained independently associated with acute GU (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.44; P < .001) and GI (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.41; P < .001) toxicity.
VMAT appears to be independently associated with lower rates of acute GI and GU toxicity when compared with traditional IMRT. Further exploration of toxicity improvements associated with VMAT use in the definitive treatment of ACP is needed.
新的强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)技术提高了治疗效率和剂量学终点。我们旨在比较容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)治疗前列腺腺癌(ACP)患者的急性胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性。
共分析了 2004 年至 2011 年期间接受根治性外照射放疗的 122 例(71 例 IMRT 和 51 例 VMAT)ACP 患者。为每位患者收集了剂量-体积直方图终点(膀胱和直肠的 V40、V65、V70 和 V75)。VMAT 治疗患者的中位随访时间为 269 天,IMRT 为 1121 天。比较了两组患者每周治疗检查时获得的急性常见不良事件毒性标准(CTCAE)GI 和 GU 毒性评分。评估了协变量与结局的单变量(UV)关联,并为每个结局拟合了多变量(MV)累积对数模型。
中位患者年龄为 68 岁,中位前列腺特异性抗原为 8.3。IMRT 组的膀胱和直肠 V40、V65、V70 和 V75 均高于 VMAT 组(P <.05),这可能是由于 IMRT 组的计划靶区较大。在 UV 关联分析中,VMAT 组的急性 GU 和急性 GI CTCAE 毒性发生率显著较低。在 MV 分析中,VMAT 与急性 GU(优势比 [OR],0.18;95%置信区间 [CI],0.07-0.44;P <.001)和 GI(OR,0.16;95% CI,0.07-0.41;P <.001)毒性独立相关。
与传统的 IMRT 相比,VMAT 似乎与较低的急性 GI 和 GU 毒性发生率独立相关。需要进一步探索 VMAT 在 ACP 根治性治疗中使用与毒性改善相关的问题。