Suppr超能文献

在放射治疗计划任务中主观和客观量化医生的工作量和绩效。

Subjective and objective quantification of physician's workload and performance during radiation therapy planning tasks.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Oct-Dec;3(4):e171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To quantify, and compare, workload for several common physician-based treatment planning tasks using objective and subjective measures of workload. To assess the relationship between workload and performance to define workload levels where performance could be expected to decline.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine physicians performed the same 3 tasks on each of 2 cases ("easy" vs "hard"). Workload was assessed objectively throughout the tasks (via monitoring of pupil size and blink rate), and subjectively at the end of each case (via National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index; NASA-TLX). NASA-TLX assesses the 6 dimensions (mental, physical, and temporal demands, frustration, effort, and performance); scores > or ≈ 50 are associated with reduced performance in other industries. Performance was measured using participants' stated willingness to approve the treatment plan. Differences in subjective and objective workload between cases, tasks, and experience were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The correlation between subjective and objective workload measures were assessed via the Pearson correlation test. The relationships between workload and performance measures were assessed using the t test.

RESULTS

Eighteen case-wise and 54 task-wise assessments were obtained. Subjective NASA-TLX scores (P < .001), but not time-weighted averages of objective scores (P > .1), were significantly lower for the easy vs hard case. Most correlations between the subjective and objective measures were not significant, except between average blink rate and NASA-TLX scores (r = -0.34, P = .02), for task-wise assessments. Performance appeared to decline at NASA-TLX scores of ≥55.

CONCLUSIONS

The NASA-TLX may provide a reasonable method to quantify subjective workload for broad activities, and objective physiologic eye-based measures may be useful to monitor workload for more granular tasks within activities. The subjective and objective measures, as herein quantified, do not necessarily track each other, and more work is needed to assess their utilities. From a series of controlled experiments, we found that performance appears to decline at subjective workload levels ≥55 (as measured via NASA-TLX), which is consistent with findings from other industries.

摘要

目的

使用客观和主观的工作量衡量标准,量化和比较几种常见的基于医生的治疗计划任务的工作量。评估工作量和性能之间的关系,以确定可能导致性能下降的工作量水平。

方法和材料

9 名医生在 2 个病例上(“容易”与“困难”)完成了相同的 3 个任务。在整个任务中通过监测瞳孔大小和眨眼率对工作量进行客观评估,并在每个病例结束时通过国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)进行主观评估。NASA-TLX 评估 6 个维度(心理、生理和时间需求、挫折感、努力和绩效);在其他行业,得分>或≈50 与绩效下降相关。使用参与者表示愿意批准治疗计划来衡量绩效。使用方差分析(ANOVA)评估病例、任务和经验之间的主观和客观工作量差异。通过 Pearson 相关检验评估主观和客观工作量测量之间的相关性。使用 t 检验评估工作量和绩效测量之间的关系。

结果

获得了 18 个病例和 54 个任务的评估。主观 NASA-TLX 评分(P<.001),但不是客观评分的时间加权平均值(P>.1),对于容易病例和困难病例来说显著较低。主观和客观测量之间的大多数相关性都不显著,除了任务层面的平均眨眼率与 NASA-TLX 评分(r=-0.34,P=0.02)之间的相关性。当 NASA-TLX 评分≥55 时,绩效似乎会下降。

结论

NASA-TLX 可能为广泛活动提供了量化主观工作量的合理方法,而基于客观生理眼的测量可能有助于监测活动中更精细任务的工作量。在本文中量化的主观和客观测量不一定相互跟踪,需要进一步工作来评估它们的效用。从一系列对照实验中,我们发现当主观工作量水平(通过 NASA-TLX 衡量)≥55 时,绩效似乎会下降,这与其他行业的发现一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验