• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在番茄的中试规模清洗和辊道输送过程中沙门氏菌的转移。

Salmonella transfer during pilot plant scale washing and roller conveying of tomatoes.

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2014 Mar;77(3):380-7. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-314.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-314
PMID:24674428
Abstract

Salmonella transfer during washing and roller conveying of inoculated tomatoes was quantified using a pilot scale tomato packing line equipped with plastic, foam, or brush rollers. Red round tomatoes (2.3 kg) were dip inoculated with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 (avirulent) (4 log CFU/g), air dried for 2 h, and then washed in sanitizer-free water for 2 min. Inoculated tomatoes were then passed single file over a 1.5-m conveyor equipped with plastic, foam, or brush rollers followed by 25 previously washed uninoculated tomatoes. Tomato samples were collected after 2 min of both washing and roller conveying, with all 25 uninoculated tomatoes collected individually after conveying. Roller surface samples were collected before and after conveying the uninoculated tomatoes. Both tomato and surface samples were quantitatively examined for Salmonella by direct plating or membrane filtration using xylose lysine Tergitol 4 agar. Regardless of the roller type, Salmonella populations on inoculated tomatoes did not significantly (P < 0.05) decrease during contact with the roller conveyors. After conveying uninoculated tomatoes over contaminated foam rollers, 96% of the 25 tomatoes were cross-contaminated with Salmonella at >100 CFU per tomato. With plastic rollers, 24 and 76% of tomatoes were cross-contaminated with Salmonella at 10 to 100 and 1 to 10 CFU per tomato, respectively. In contrast, only 8% of 25 tomatoes were cross-contaminated with brush rollers with Salmonella populations of 1 to 10 CFU per tomato. Overall, cross-contamination was greatest with foam, followed by plastic and brush rollers (P < 0.05). Adding peroxyacetic acid or chlorine to the wash water significantly decreased cross-contamination during tomato conveying, with chlorine less effective in controlling Salmonella on foam compared with plastic and brush rollers.

摘要

采用配备有塑料、泡沫或毛刷辊的试验规模番茄包装线,定量评估了接种番茄在洗涤和辊筒输送过程中的沙门氏菌转移情况。将红圆番茄(2.3 千克)浸入含有无毒性鼠伤寒沙门氏菌 LT2(4 对数 CFU/g)的溶液中进行蘸菌接种,风干 2 小时,然后在无菌水中清洗 2 分钟。接种后的番茄随后单排通过配备有塑料、泡沫或毛刷辊的 1.5 米长的传送装置,然后是 25 个之前已清洗的未接种的番茄。在洗涤和辊筒输送 2 分钟后,采集番茄样本,在传送完成后,逐个采集所有 25 个未接种的番茄。在传送未接种番茄前后,采集辊筒表面样本。采用木糖赖氨酸 Tergitol 4 琼脂通过直接平板计数或膜过滤法,对番茄和表面样本中的沙门氏菌进行定量检测。无论采用哪种类型的辊筒,接种番茄与辊筒接触时,其表面的沙门氏菌数量均未显著(P<0.05)减少。在受污染的泡沫辊筒上输送未接种的番茄后,25 个番茄中有 96%受到沙门氏菌交叉污染,每个番茄的污染水平>100 CFU。采用塑料辊筒时,分别有 24%和 76%的番茄受到沙门氏菌交叉污染,污染水平分别为 10 至 100 CFU/个和 1 至 10 CFU/个。相比之下,采用毛刷辊筒时,仅有 8%的 25 个番茄受到沙门氏菌污染,每个番茄的污染水平为 1 至 10 CFU。总体而言,泡沫辊筒的交叉污染最严重,其次是塑料辊筒和毛刷辊筒(P<0.05)。在番茄输送过程中,向洗涤水中添加过氧乙酸或氯可显著降低交叉污染,而与塑料和毛刷辊筒相比,氯对控制泡沫辊筒上的沙门氏菌效果较差。

相似文献

1
Salmonella transfer during pilot plant scale washing and roller conveying of tomatoes.在番茄的中试规模清洗和辊道输送过程中沙门氏菌的转移。
J Food Prot. 2014 Mar;77(3):380-7. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-314.
2
Efficacy of various sanitizers against Salmonella during simulated commercial packing of tomatoes.各种消毒剂在模拟商业包装番茄时对沙门氏菌的杀菌效果。
J Food Prot. 2014 Nov;77(11):1868-75. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-213.
3
Quantitative transfer of Salmonella Typhimurium LT2 during mechanical slicing of tomatoes as impacted by multiple processing variables.受多种加工变量影响,鼠伤寒沙门氏菌LT2在番茄机械切片过程中的定量转移。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Oct 3;234:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.035. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
Use of a Novel Sanitizer To Inactivate Salmonella Typhimurium and Spoilage Microorganisms during Flume Washing of Diced Tomatoes.新型消毒剂在切丁番茄管道清洗过程中对鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和腐败微生物的杀灭作用。
J Food Prot. 2020 Dec 1;83(12):2158-2166. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-134.
5
Assessing the efficacy of sanitizer sprays during brush or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) roller treatment to reduce Salmonella populations on whole mangoes.评估喷雾消毒剂在刷涂或聚氯乙烯(PVC)滚轮处理过程中的功效,以减少整个芒果上沙门氏菌的数量。
Food Res Int. 2024 Sep;191:114590. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114590. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
6
Control of Salmonella Cross-Contamination between Green Round Tomatoes in a Model Flume System.模型水槽系统中绿色圆形番茄之间沙门氏菌交叉污染的控制
J Food Prot. 2015 Jul;78(7):1280-7. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-524.
7
Determination of Optimum Sanitizer Levels for Prevention of Salmonella Cross-Contamination of Mature Round Tomatoes in a Laboratory Model Flume System.在实验室模型水槽系统中确定预防成熟圆番茄沙门氏菌交叉污染的最佳消毒剂水平
J Food Prot. 2017 Sep;80(9):1436-1442. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-032.
8
Influence of Free Chlorine and Contact Time on the Reduction of Salmonella Cross-Contamination of Tomatoes in a Model Flume System.游离氯和接触时间对模型水槽系统中减少番茄交叉污染沙门氏菌的影响。
J Food Prot. 2022 Jan 1;85(1):22-26. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-212.
9
Evaluation of overhead spray-applied sanitizers for the reduction of Salmonella on tomato surfaces.评估喷雾式消毒剂对番茄表面沙门氏菌的减少效果。
J Food Sci. 2012 Jan;77(1):M65-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02486.x. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
10
Salmonella inactivation and sponge/microfiber mediated cross-contamination during papaya wash with chlorine or peracetic acid as sanitizer.经氯或过氧乙酸作为消毒剂清洗木瓜时,沙门氏菌的失活和海绵/微纤维介导的交叉污染。
Food Microbiol. 2021 May;95:103677. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103677. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A simulation model to quantify the efficacy of dry cleaning interventions on a contaminated milk powder line.一种用于量化干洗干预措施对受污染奶粉生产线功效的模拟模型。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025 May 21;91(5):e0208624. doi: 10.1128/aem.02086-24. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Postharvest Supply Chain with Microbial Travelers: a Farm-to-Retail Microbial Simulation and Visualization Framework.采后供应链中的微生物旅行者:从农场到零售的微生物模拟和可视化框架。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Aug 17;84(17). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00813-18. Print 2018 Sep 1.