• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估四个方向盘,以确定驾驶员在静态环境中的手放置位置。

Evaluation of four steering wheels to determine driver hand placement in a static environment.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Clemson University, 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC, USA.

Clemson University International Center for Automotive Research, 4 Research Dr., Greenville, SC 29607, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2014 Jul;45(4):1187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.008
PMID:24674782
Abstract

While much research exists on occupant packaging both proprietary and in the literature, more detailed research regarding user preferences for subjective ratings of steering wheel designs is sparse in published literature. This study aimed to explore the driver interactions with production steering wheels in four vehicles by using anthropometric data, driver hand placement, and driver grip design preferences for Generation-Y and Baby Boomers. In this study, participants selected their preferred grip diameter, responded to a series of questions about the steering wheel grip as they sat in four vehicles, and rank ordered their preferred grip design. Thirty-two male participants (16 Baby Boomers between ages 47 and 65 and 16 Generation-Y between ages 18 and 29) participated in the study. Drivers demonstrated different gripping behavior between vehicles and between groups. Recommendations for future work in steering wheel grip design and naturalistic driver hand positioning are discussed.

摘要

虽然有很多关于乘员包装的研究,无论是专有研究还是文献研究,但在已发表的文献中,关于用户对方向盘设计的主观评价偏好的更详细研究却很少。本研究旨在通过使用人体测量数据、驾驶员手的位置和驾驶员握把设计偏好,探索驾驶员与四辆汽车中的生产方向盘之间的交互作用。在这项研究中,参与者选择了他们喜欢的握把直径,在坐在四辆汽车中时回答了一系列关于方向盘握把的问题,并对他们喜欢的握把设计进行了排序。32 名男性参与者(16 名年龄在 47 岁至 65 岁之间的婴儿潮一代和 16 名年龄在 18 岁至 29 岁之间的 Y 一代)参加了这项研究。驾驶员在不同车辆和不同群体之间表现出不同的握持行为。讨论了未来在方向盘握把设计和自然驾驶手位置方面的工作建议。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of four steering wheels to determine driver hand placement in a static environment.评估四个方向盘,以确定驾驶员在静态环境中的手放置位置。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jul;45(4):1187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
2
Vehicle and driver attributes affecting distance from the steering wheel in motor vehicles.影响机动车中驾驶员与方向盘距离的车辆及驾驶员属性。
Hum Factors. 2000 Winter;42(4):676-82. doi: 10.1518/001872000779697971.
3
Equivalent comfort contours for vertical vibration of steering wheels: effect of vibration magnitude, grip force, and hand position.方向盘垂直振动的等效舒适度轮廓:振动幅度、握持力和手位置的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Sep;40(5):817-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
4
Differences between obese and non-obese drivers in preferred vehicle interior components setting and driving posture.肥胖与非肥胖驾驶者在偏好的车辆内部部件设置和驾驶姿势上的差异。
Ergonomics. 2017 May;60(5):731-742. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1211322. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
5
Effects of target location, stature and hand grip type on in-vehicle reach discomfort.目标位置、身高和手握类型对车内伸展不适的影响。
Ergonomics. 2011 May;54(5):466-76. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.564312.
6
Ergonomics and comfort in lawn mower handle positioning: An evaluation of handle geometry.割草机手柄位置的人体工程学与舒适性:手柄几何形状评估
Appl Ergon. 2015 Nov;51:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Development of seating accommodation models for soldiers in vehicles.车辆中士兵座位适配模型的开发。
Ergonomics. 2017 Apr;60(4):589-596. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1184760. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
Determination of pre-impact occupant postures and analysis of consequences on injury outcome. Part I: a driving simulator study.碰撞前乘员姿势的确定及其对损伤结果的影响分析。第一部分:驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.012.
9
Experimental study on fist-ellipse for Chinese auto drivers.中国汽车驾驶员握拳椭圆度的实验研究
Appl Ergon. 2002 Jan;33(1):101-3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(01)00033-3.
10
Driver behavior following an automatic steering intervention.驾驶员在自动转向干预后的驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Oct;83:190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.018.

引用本文的文献

1
An empirical study on new-energy vehicle users' preferences of in-vehicle interaction input methods.新能源汽车用户对车内交互输入方式偏好的实证研究
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 21;10(12):e33376. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33376. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.