1William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI. 2Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. 3Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 4Biostatistical Consulting Unit, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1703-13. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000319.
To assess the efficacy of a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter-related colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection using meta-analysis.
Multiple computerized database searches supplemented by manual searches including relevant conference proceedings.
Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing compared with conventional dressings for prevention of catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection.
Data were extracted on patient and catheter characteristics and outcomes.
Nine randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Use of a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing resulted in a reduced prevalence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (random effects relative risk, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88, p = 0.009). The prevalence of catheter colonization was also markedly reduced in the chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing group (random effects relative risk, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43-0.64; p < 0.001). There was significant benefit for prevention of catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection, including arterial catheters used for hemodynamic monitoring. Other than in low birth weight infants, adverse effects were rare and minor.
Our analysis shows that a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing is beneficial in preventing catheter colonization and, more importantly, catheter-related bloodstream infection and warrants routine use in patients at high risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection and central venous catheter or arterial catheter colonization.
采用荟萃分析评估氯己定浸渍敷料预防中心静脉导管相关性定植和导管相关血流感染的疗效。
计算机检索多个数据库并辅以手工检索,包括相关会议记录。
随机对照试验,评估氯己定浸渍敷料与常规敷料预防导管定植和导管相关血流感染的疗效。
提取患者和导管特征及结局的数据。
9 项随机对照试验符合纳入标准。与常规敷料相比,使用氯己定浸渍敷料可降低导管相关血流感染的发生率(随机效应相对风险 0.60;95%CI 0.41-0.88,p = 0.009)。氯己定浸渍敷料组导管定植的发生率也明显降低(随机效应相对风险 0.52;95%CI 0.43-0.64;p < 0.001)。预防导管定植和导管相关血流感染,包括用于血流动力学监测的动脉导管,均有显著获益。除了在低出生体重儿中,不良事件罕见且轻微。
我们的分析表明,氯己定浸渍敷料有利于预防导管定植,更重要的是,预防导管相关血流感染,值得在有导管相关血流感染和中心静脉导管或动脉导管定植高危风险的患者中常规使用。