Ann Arbor, Mich. From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, the University of Michigan Health System; and the Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Apr;133(4):958-964. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000002.
Many instructional guides have been published on how to write scientific papers. Likewise, many published articles have focused on the reasons why submitted manuscripts are rejected. However, fewer publications have been presented to guide authors on how to address reviewers' comments in a manuscript revision. Even fewer counsel authors on how to deal with a rejection decision. In this article, the authors present a literature review on the strategies to get a manuscript accepted, despite an initial unfavorable review. The authors share their experience with addressing reviewers' comments to get a manuscript accepted and published. Finally, the authors discuss the process of peer review and offer tips on how to be an effective peer reviewer.
许多关于如何撰写科学论文的教学指南已经出版。同样，许多已发表的文章也侧重于投稿被拒的原因。然而，指导作者如何在稿件修改中处理审稿人意见的出版物较少。指导作者如何应对拒绝决定的出版物就更少了。在本文中，作者对尽管最初的评价不佳但仍使稿件被接受的策略进行了文献回顾。作者分享了他们处理审稿人意见以使稿件被接受和发表的经验。最后，作者讨论了同行评审的过程，并提供了一些关于如何成为一名有效同行评审人的技巧。
