Fine Nowell M, Daly Richard C, Shankar Nisha, Park Soon J, Kushwaha Sudhir S, Gandhi Manish J, Pereira Naveen L
1 Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 2 Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 4 Address correspondence to: Naveen L. Pereira, M.D., Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55901.
Transplantation. 2014 Jul 27;98(2):229-38. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000047.
Acute allograft dysfunction (AAD) is an important cause of morbidity among heart transplant recipients. The role of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in AAD, with the increasing use of single antigen bead (SAB) assays that have improved the ability to detect DSA, remains unclear.
We retrospectively reviewed 329 heart transplant recipients followed up at our institution. AAD was defined as an acute decline in left ventricular ejection fraction to less than 50% and a decrement of 10% or higher compared to baseline in the absence of cellular rejection. Patients with AAD were compared with matched 30 heart transplant controls.
There were 10 (3%) patients with AAD, 4 (40%) had DSA detectable by SAB assay compared to 16 (53%) controls (P=0.43). Peak DSA mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) levels were significantly higher at baseline (class I and class II) in AAD compared to controls. DSA MFI values increased at the time of AAD and returned to baseline values during follow-up for these patients with AAD (P<0.05) but remained unchanged over time for controls. Six (60%) patients with AAD and 1 (3%) control had antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) by endomyocardial biopsy (P<0.01). There were 4 (40%) patients with AAD with no DSA or AMR.
AAD after heart transplant is a heterogeneous process characterized by 1) AMR and DSA, 2) AMR but no DSA, and 3) no AMR or DSA. The presence of DSA is not associated with AAD, but the quantity assessed by MFI levels may play a role.
急性移植物功能障碍(AAD)是心脏移植受者发病的重要原因。随着单抗原珠(SAB)检测方法的使用增加,其检测供者特异性抗体(DSA)的能力有所提高,但DSA在AAD中的作用仍不明确。
我们回顾性分析了在我院接受随访的329例心脏移植受者。AAD定义为左心室射血分数急性下降至低于50%,且在无细胞排斥的情况下较基线下降10%或更多。将发生AAD的患者与30例匹配的心脏移植对照进行比较。
有10例(3%)患者发生AAD,其中4例(40%)通过SAB检测可检测到DSA,而对照组为16例(53%)(P=0.43)。与对照组相比,AAD患者基线时(I类和II类)DSA的峰值平均荧光强度(MFI)水平显著更高。AAD发生时DSA的MFI值升高,在这些AAD患者的随访期间恢复至基线值(P<0.05),但对照组随时间保持不变。6例(60%)AAD患者和1例(3%)对照经心内膜心肌活检诊断为抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)(P<0.01)。有4例(40%)AAD患者无DSA或AMR。
心脏移植后的AAD是一个异质性过程,其特征为:1)AMR和DSA;2)AMR但无DSA;3)无AMR或DSA。DSA的存在与AAD无关,但通过MFI水平评估的量可能起作用。