Li Feiming, Gimpel John R, Arenson Ethan, Song Hao, Bates Bruce P, Ludwin Fredric
National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, 8765 W Higgins Rd, Suite 200, Chicago, IL 60631-4174.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Apr;114(4):260-6. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.051.
Few studies have investigated how well scores from the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA (COMLEX-USA) series predict resident outcomes, such as performance on board certification examinations.
To determine how well COMLEX-USA predicts performance on the American Osteopathic Board of Emergency Medicine (AOBEM) Part I certification examination.
The target study population was first-time examinees who took AOBEM Part I in 2011 and 2012 with matched performances on COMLEX-USA Level 1, Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation (CE), and Level 3. Pearson correlations were computed between AOBEM Part I first-attempt scores and COMLEX-USA performances to measure the association between these examinations. Stepwise linear regression analysis was conducted to predict AOBEM Part I scores by the 3 COMLEX-USA scores. An independent t test was conducted to compare mean COMLEX-USA performances between candidates who passed and who failed AOBEM Part I, and a stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to predict the log-odds of passing AOBEM Part I on the basis of COMLEX-USA scores.
Scores from AOBEM Part I had the highest correlation with COMLEX-USA Level 3 scores (.57) and slightly lower correlation with COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE scores (.53). The lowest correlation was between AOBEM Part I and COMLEX-USA Level 1 scores (.47). According to the stepwise regression model, COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores, which residency programs often use as selection criteria, together explained 30% of variance in AOBEM Part I scores. Adding Level 3 scores explained 37% of variance. The independent t test indicated that the 397 examinees passing AOBEM Part I performed significantly better than the 54 examinees failing AOBEM Part I in all 3 COMLEX-USA levels (P<.001 for all 3 levels). The logistic regression model showed that COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 3 scores predicted the log-odds of passing AOBEM Part I (P=.03 and P<.001, respectively).
The present study empirically supported the predictive and discriminant validities of the COMLEX-USA series in relation to the AOBEM Part I certification examination. Although residency programs may use COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores as partial criteria in selecting residents, Level 3 scores, though typically not available at the time of application, are actually the most statistically related to performances on AOBEM Part I.
很少有研究调查美国综合骨病医学执照考试(COMLEX - USA)系列成绩对住院医师培训结果(如委员会认证考试成绩)的预测能力。
确定COMLEX - USA对美国骨病急诊医学委员会(AOBEM)第一部分认证考试成绩的预测能力。
目标研究人群为2011年和2012年首次参加AOBEM第一部分考试且在COMLEX - USA一级、二级认知评估(CE)和三级考试中有匹配成绩的考生。计算AOBEM第一部分首次考试成绩与COMLEX - USA成绩之间的Pearson相关性,以衡量这些考试之间的关联。进行逐步线性回归分析,以通过COMLEX - USA的三个成绩预测AOBEM第一部分的成绩。进行独立t检验,比较通过和未通过AOBEM第一部分的考生在COMLEX - USA各水平上的平均成绩,并使用逐步逻辑回归分析,根据COMLEX - USA成绩预测通过AOBEM第一部分的对数几率。
AOBEM第一部分的成绩与COMLEX - USA三级成绩的相关性最高(0.57),与COMLEX - USA二级CE成绩的相关性略低(0.53)。相关性最低的是AOBEM第一部分与COMLEX - USA一级成绩(0.47)。根据逐步回归模型,住院医师培训项目通常用作选拔标准的COMLEX - USA一级和二级CE成绩,共同解释了AOBEM第一部分成绩中30%的方差。加入三级成绩后,解释了37%的方差。独立t检验表明,397名通过AOBEM第一部分的考生在COMLEX - USA的所有三个水平上的表现均显著优于54名未通过AOBEM第一部分的考生(所有三个水平的P值均<0.001)。逻辑回归模型显示,COMLEX - USA一级和三级成绩预测了通过AOBEM第一部分的对数几率(分别为P = 0.03和P<0.001)。
本研究从实证角度支持了COMLEX - USA系列考试相对于AOBEM第一部分认证考试的预测效度和区分效度。虽然住院医师培训项目可能将COMLEX - USA一级和二级CE成绩用作选拔住院医师的部分标准,但三级成绩虽然通常在申请时无法获得,但实际上与AOBEM第一部分的成绩在统计学上最为相关。