• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整骨医学专业的学生和住院医师对键盘数据输入的使用情况。

Keyboard data entry use among osteopathic medical students and residents.

作者信息

Helstrom Julia M, Langenau Erik E, Sandella Jeanne M, Mote Beth L

机构信息

Physician Trainer for Clinical Skills Testing, NBOME, 101 W Elm St, Suite 150, Conshohocken, PA 19428-2004.

出版信息

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Apr;114(4):274-82. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.053.

DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2014.053
PMID:24677467
Abstract

CONTEXT

Candidates taking the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation (COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE) are currently evaluated on their ability to document clinical findings using a handwritten postencounter note. However, keyboard data entry is increasingly used for medical documentation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the use and perception of keyboard data entry among osteopathic medical students and residents in educational and clinical settings.

METHODS

A Web-based survey regarding frequency of and preference for keyboard data entry was distributed to 9801 osteopathic medical students, 17,268 osteopathic residents, and 34 clinical deans of colleges of osteopathic medicine (COMs). In addition, 31 COMs' clinical skills center directors were contacted to participate in a telephone survey about the use of keyboard data entry in their centers.

RESULTS

A total of 1711 students, 1198 residents, 14 clinical deans, and 17 clinical skills center directors responded to the surveys. The majority of students (872 [51%]) reported using electronic keyboard data entry at their COM's clinical skills center for postencounter notes. Among respondents, 379 students (23%), 77 residents (9%), and 1 clinical dean reported that electronic keyboard data entry is never or rarely used during clinical rotations. Most trainees (1592 students [93%], 864 residents [94%]) reported that they were either comfortable or very comfortable with typing. Given the option of recording methods for SOAP (subjective, objective, assessment, plan) note findings on the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE, 7 clinical deans were unsure of their students' preferences, while the remaining favored keyboard data entry (5) over handwriting (2). The majority of student and resident respondents would choose keyboard data entry (1009 [60%] and 511 [55%], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Osteopathic medical students and residents are comfortable with typing; they are exposed to and would prefer using an electronic form of entry for medical documentation. These results support a conversion from written postencounter notes to keyboard data entry of notes on the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE.

摘要

背景

参加美国骨病医学综合执照考试二级——实践评估(COMLEX - USA二级 - PE)的考生目前是通过手写的诊后记录来评估其记录临床发现的能力。然而,键盘数据录入在医疗记录中使用得越来越频繁。

目的

确定骨病医学学生和住院医师在教育和临床环境中对键盘数据录入的使用情况及看法。

方法

一项关于键盘数据录入频率和偏好的网络调查被分发给9801名骨病医学学生、17268名骨病住院医师以及34名骨病医学院(COM)的临床院长。此外,31名COM临床技能中心主任被联系参与一项关于其中心键盘数据录入使用情况的电话调查。

结果

共有1711名学生、1198名住院医师、14名临床院长和17名临床技能中心主任回复了调查。大多数学生(872名[51%])报告在其COM的临床技能中心使用电子键盘数据录入来记录诊后记录。在受访者中,379名学生(23%)、77名住院医师(9%)和1名临床院长报告在临床轮转期间从未或很少使用电子键盘数据录入。大多数实习生(1592名学生[93%],864名住院医师[94%])报告他们对打字感到舒适或非常舒适。在COMLEX - USA二级 - PE考试中,若可选择记录主观、客观、评估、计划(SOAP)记录发现的方法,7名临床院长不确定其学生的偏好,而其余的则更倾向于键盘数据录入(5名)而非手写(2名)。大多数学生和住院医师受访者会选择键盘数据录入(分别为1009名[60%]和511名[55%])。

结论

骨病医学学生和住院医师对打字感到舒适;他们接触过并且更倾向于使用电子形式录入医疗记录。这些结果支持将COMLEX - USA二级 - PE考试中的诊后手写记录转换为键盘数据录入。

相似文献

1
Keyboard data entry use among osteopathic medical students and residents.整骨医学专业的学生和住院医师对键盘数据输入的使用情况。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Apr;114(4):274-82. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.053.
2
Pass/fail patterns of candidates who failed COMLEX-USA level 2-PE because of misrepresentation of clinical findings on postencounter notes.因会诊后记录中临床检查结果存在不实陈述而未通过美国国家医师执照综合考试第二部分专业技能考试(COMLEX-USA level 2-PE)的考生的通过/未通过模式。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011 Jul;111(7):432-6.
3
Prediction of Osteopathic Medical School Performance on the basis of MCAT score, GPA, sex, undergraduate major, and undergraduate institution.基于医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩、平均绩点(GPA)、性别、本科专业和本科院校对整骨医学院表现的预测。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012 Apr;112(4):175-81.
4
Preparation Strategies of Osteopathic Medical Students for the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE.美国骨病医学院学生针对美国骨病医学执照考试第二部分——实践考试(COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE)的备考策略
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Apr;116(4):234-42. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.048.
5
Survey on the clinical skills of osteopathic medical students.整骨医学专业学生临床技能调查
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 May;106(5):296-301.
6
Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA level 1 and level 2-cognitive evaluation preparation and outcomes.美国综合整骨医学许可考试一级和二级——认知评估准备及结果
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Apr;115(4):232-5. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.046.
7
Patient note fabrication and consequences of unprofessional behavior in a high-stakes clinical skills licensing examination.在高风险的临床技能许可考试中伪造患者记录和不专业行为的后果。
Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10 Suppl):S70-3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b37e36.
8
Patterns of misrepresentation of clinical findings on patient notes during the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE.美国综合骨科医学执照考试第二部分专业技能考试(COMLEX - USA Level 2 - PE)中患者记录上临床检查结果的错误表述模式。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Jan;114(1):22-9. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.004.
9
Consistency of interrater scoring of student performances of osteopathic manipulative treatment on COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE.美国骨疗法执照考试(COMLEX-USA)二级实践考试(Level 2-PE)中,学生整骨手法治疗表现的评分者间评分一致性。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Apr;114(4):253-8. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.050.
10
Frequency of specific osteopathic manipulative treatment modalities used by candidates while taking COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE.考生在参加美国骨病医学执照考试(COMLEX-USA)二级实践考试(Level 2-PE)时使用特定整骨手法治疗方式的频率。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012 Aug;112(8):509-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical student awareness of and interest in clinical informatics.医学生对临床信息学的认识和兴趣。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e42-7. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu046. Epub 2015 Feb 28.