Sandella Jeanne M, Peters Alex, Smith Larissa L, Gimpel John R
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Apr;116(4):234-42. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.048.
Since 2002, osteopathic medical schools have made curricular changes to further enhance the clinical skills of their students, to prepare them for residency training, and to pass the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation (COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE).
To report how students at osteopathic medical schools prepare for the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE, and to investigate the effect of these techniques on examination performance.
A standardized survey was given to students before the beginning of their examination to assess the preparation of osteopathic medical students for the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE, such as coursework, orientation materials, and standardized patient (SP) encounters. Surveys that were completed by first-time test takers during the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 test cycles were included in this study.
Of 9120 surveys administered, 8733 were completed, achieving a response rate of 95.8%. Of those 8733 respondents, 8706 students (99.7%) reported having SP encounters during the first and second year of medical school, and 7379 (84%) reported having at least 1 SP encounter in years 3 and 4. Of 8733 students, 6079 (70%) reported receiving feedback from an osteopathic physician on their SP encounters, and 6049 (69%) and 6253 (72%) reported having viewed the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE orientation video online and having read the examination's orientation guide, respectively. The largest difference in preparation between students who passed the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE and students who did not was a prerequisite SP examination at their school, with 5574 students (68.9%) who passed reporting having participated compared with 364 students (56.5%) who failed. None of the differences in clinical skills training and test preparation was associated with statistically significant differences in pass or fail status.
Osteopathic medical students use a variety of methods to enhance their clinical skills in preparation for the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE, with universal use of SP programs since the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE was implemented in 2004. Educators should continue to foster ways to develop students' clinical skills that reflect new advances in education and assessment to ensure that future osteopathic physicians can demonstrate competency in fundamental clinical skills before beginning postgraduate training.
自2002年以来,整骨医学院进行了课程改革,以进一步提高学生的临床技能,为住院医师培训做好准备,并通过美国综合整骨医学执照考试二级——实践评估(COMLEX-USA二级-PE)。
报告整骨医学院的学生如何为COMLEX-USA二级-PE做准备,并调查这些方法对考试成绩的影响。
在考试开始前,对学生进行了一项标准化调查,以评估整骨医学学生为COMLEX-USA二级-PE的准备情况,如课程作业、指导材料和标准化病人(SP)接触。本研究纳入了2013-2014年和2014-2015年考试周期中首次参加考试的考生完成的调查问卷。
在发放的9120份调查问卷中,8733份被完成,回复率为95.8%。在这8733名受访者中,8706名学生(99.7%)报告在医学院的第一年和第二年有过SP接触,7379名(84%)报告在第三年和第四年至少有过1次SP接触。在8733名学生中,6079名(70%)报告从整骨医生那里得到了关于他们SP接触的反馈,6049名(69%)和6253名(72%)分别报告在线观看了COMLEX-USA二级-PE指导视频和阅读了考试指导手册。通过COMLEX-USA二级-PE的学生和未通过的学生在准备方面的最大差异是他们学校的一项必修SP考试,通过的5574名学生(68.9%)报告参加了考试,而未通过的364名学生(56.5%)也参加了考试。临床技能培训和考试准备方面的差异均与通过或未通过状态的统计学显著差异无关。
整骨医学学生使用多种方法来提高他们的临床技能,为COMLEX-USA二级-PE做准备,自2004年COMLEX-USA二级-PE实施以来,普遍采用了SP项目。教育工作者应继续探索培养学生临床技能的方法,以反映教育和评估方面的新进展,确保未来的整骨医生在开始研究生培训之前能够证明自己具备基本临床技能。