Suppr超能文献

比较了测定血清中总淀粉酶活性和淀粉酶同工酶的方法。

Methods compared for determining total amylase activity and amylase isoenzymes in serum.

作者信息

Badenoch J L, Bals R

机构信息

Division of Clinical Chemistry, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, S.A., Australia.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1989 Apr;35(4):645-8.

PMID:2467765
Abstract

We evaluated two kinetic methods for determining total amylase activity and isoenzyme composition in serum. Stability studies of reagents for measuring total activity indicate that reagents containing 4-nitrophenyl-alpha-glucosides or enzyme-linked reagents can be stored only for seven days at 4 degrees C. Methods based on 4-nitrophenyl-alpha-glucoside substrates cannot be used if the reagent absorbance at 405 nm exceeds 2. However, in the alpha-amylase EPS method (Boehringer Mannheim) an ethylidene-protected 4-nitrophenyl-alpha-D-maltoheptaoside substrate is stable for up to 28 days after reconstitution. Further studies indicated that the Amylase-DS (Beckman) and the alpha-Amylase EPS standard curves are linear to at least six times the upper limit of the reference interval. Within-batch imprecision (CV less than 1.1%) and between-batch imprecision (CV less than 3.3%) for these two methods are comparable with those for other kinetic methods, and there is excellent correlation (r2 = 0.983) between the two methods. The reference interval, determined by use of samples from 90 healthy blood donors, is 31 to 141 U/L for the amylase-DS method, 22 to 92 U/L for the alpha-Amylase EPS method. We also used these two methods to measure amylase isoenzymes after inhibiting the salivary isoenzyme with either a lectin or a monoclonal antibody. We found the monoclonal antibody method more specific than the lectin inhibition method for determining the isoenzymes.

摘要

我们评估了两种测定血清中总淀粉酶活性和同工酶组成的动力学方法。测量总活性试剂的稳定性研究表明,含有4-硝基苯基-α-葡糖苷的试剂或酶联试剂在4℃下只能保存7天。如果试剂在405nm处的吸光度超过2,则基于4-硝基苯基-α-葡糖苷底物的方法不能使用。然而,在α-淀粉酶EPS方法(勃林格殷格翰)中,一种亚乙基保护的4-硝基苯基-α-D-麦芽庚糖苷底物在复溶后可稳定长达28天。进一步研究表明,淀粉酶-DS(贝克曼)和α-淀粉酶EPS标准曲线至少在参考区间上限的六倍范围内呈线性。这两种方法的批内不精密度(CV小于1.1%)和批间不精密度(CV小于3.3%)与其他动力学方法相当,且两种方法之间具有极好的相关性(r2 = 0.983)。通过使用90名健康献血者的样本确定的参考区间,淀粉酶-DS方法为31至141 U/L,α-淀粉酶EPS方法为22至92 U/L。我们还使用这两种方法在使用凝集素或单克隆抗体抑制唾液同工酶后测量淀粉酶同工酶。我们发现单克隆抗体法在测定同工酶方面比凝集素抑制法更具特异性。

相似文献

5
Evaluation of an amylase method utilizing p-nitrophenyl glucosides as substrates.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Aug;78(2):184-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.2.184.
6
Serum amylase and isoamylase assay on the Hitachi 705 automatic clinical chemical analyzer.
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1984 Jan;22(1):41-5. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1984.22.1.41.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验