• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MR 引导下真空辅助乳腺活检:活检后 24-48 小时行短期 MRI 检查可降低假阴性率。

MR imaging-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: reduction of false-negative biopsies by short-term control MRI 24-48 h after biopsy.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2014 Jul;69(7):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2014.02.003
PMID:24679372
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate whether another contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination 24-48 h after MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (MRI-VAB) can reduce the rate of false-negative cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 252 patients who underwent MRI-VAB for the clarification of 299 lesions. The success of MRI-VAB was assessed at interventional MRI and another CE MRI 24-48 h after the intervention. In cases of successful MRI-VAB (complete or partial lesion removal) and benign histological results, follow-up breast MRI was performed. In cases of unsuccessful biopsy (unchanged lesion), tissue sampling was repeated. False-negative cases were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of MRI follow-up within 2 days after intervention.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight malignant (32.8%) and 201 (67.2%) benign lesions were diagnosed using MRI-VAB. At immediate unenhanced control MRI, all lesions were assessed as successfully biopsied. In 18 benign cases (6%), CE MRI after 24-48 h showed an unsuccessful intervention. Further tissue sampling revealed another 13 cancers in these patients. This results in a false-negative rate of 11.7%. Follow-up MRI of the benign lesions presented no further malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-VAB with immediate unenhanced control offers a success rate of 94%. The rate of false-negative biopsies (11.7%) could be reduced to zero by using short-term follow-up MRI. Therefore, a further CE breast MRI 24-48 h after benign MRI-VAB to eliminate missed cancers is recommended.

摘要

目的

评估 MRI 引导下真空辅助乳腺活检(MRI-VAB)后 24-48 小时进行另一次对比增强(CE)磁共振成像(MRI)检查是否可以降低假阴性病例的发生率。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 252 例因 299 个病灶而行 MRI-VAB 的患者。在介入 MRI 检查和干预后 24-48 小时进行另一次 CE MRI 检查,评估 MRI-VAB 的成功率。对于 MRI-VAB 成功(完全或部分切除病灶)且组织学结果为良性的患者,进行随访乳腺 MRI 检查。对于活检不成功(病灶未改变)的患者,重复进行组织取样。计算假阴性病例,以评估介入后 2 天内 MRI 随访的诊断价值。

结果

通过 MRI-VAB 诊断出 98 个恶性(32.8%)和 201 个良性(67.2%)病灶。在即时未增强的对照 MRI 检查中,所有病灶均被评估为成功活检。在 18 例良性病例(6%)中,24-48 小时后的 CE MRI 显示干预不成功。进一步的组织取样显示这些患者中还有另外 13 例癌症。这导致假阴性率为 11.7%。对良性病灶的随访 MRI 未发现进一步的恶性肿瘤。

结论

即时未增强对照的 MRI-VAB 成功率为 94%。通过使用短期随访 MRI,可以将假阴性活检(11.7%)的发生率降低至零。因此,建议在良性 MRI-VAB 后 24-48 小时进行进一步的 CE 乳腺 MRI,以排除遗漏的癌症。

相似文献

1
MR imaging-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: reduction of false-negative biopsies by short-term control MRI 24-48 h after biopsy.MR 引导下真空辅助乳腺活检:活检后 24-48 小时行短期 MRI 检查可降低假阴性率。
Clin Radiol. 2014 Jul;69(7):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
2
Imaging-Concordant Benign MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy May Not Warrant MRI Follow-Up.影像一致的良性MRI引导下真空辅助乳腺活检可能无需MRI随访。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Apr;208(4):916-922. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16576. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Vacuum-assisted breast biopsies (VAB) carried out on an open 1.0T MR imager: Influence of patient and target characteristics on the procedural and clinical results.在开放式1.0T磁共振成像仪上进行的真空辅助乳腺活检(VAB):患者和靶区特征对操作及临床结果的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jun;85(6):1157-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Large-Volume Breast Biopsy (MR-Guided VALB).磁共振引导下真空辅助大体积乳腺活检术(MR引导下VALB)的安全性与有效性
Invest Radiol. 2017 Mar;52(3):186-193. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000331.
5
Significance of fine needle aspiration cytology and vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy for small breast lesions.细针穿刺细胞学检查及真空辅助芯针活检对乳腺小病灶的意义
Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Feb;15(1):e23-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
6
Freehand 3T MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): a five-year experience.徒手3T磁共振引导下真空辅助乳腺活检(VAB):五年经验
Acta Radiol. 2018 May;59(5):540-545. doi: 10.1177/0284185117730102. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Feasibility of Vacuum-Assisted Breast Cone-Beam CT-Guided Biopsy and Comparison With Prone Stereotactic Biopsy.真空辅助乳腺锥形束CT引导活检的可行性及与俯卧位立体定向活检的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May;208(5):1154-1162. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16760. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
8
MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation.磁共振成像引导下10号真空辅助乳腺活检:组织学特征
Radiol Med. 2008 Sep;113(6):830-40. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0289-y. Epub 2008 Jul 5.
9
Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.数字乳腺断层合成引导下真空辅助乳腺活检:初步经验及与俯卧位立体定位真空辅助活检的比较。
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):654-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141397. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
10
Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during 16-gauge core needle biopsy system: would vacuum-assisted removal get significantly more definitive histologic diagnosis than vacuum-assisted biopsy?在 16 号空心针活检系统中,影像学-组织学存在差异的乳腺病变:真空辅助切除是否比真空辅助活检能获得更明确的组织学诊断?
Breast J. 2011 Sep-Oct;17(5):456-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01128.x. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Benchmark Metrics and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.MRI引导下乳腺活检的性能基准指标与临床病理结果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Breast Health. 2023 Jan 1;19(1):1-27. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-12-1. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Malignancy rates of B3-lesions in breast magnetic resonance imaging - do all lesions have to be excised?乳腺磁共振成像中B3级病变的恶性率——所有病变都必须切除吗?
BMC Med Imaging. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12880-018-0271-7.