Suppr超能文献

非鼻-鼻窦相关嗅觉功能障碍:一组 496 例患者。

Non-sinonasal-related olfactory dysfunction: A cohort of 496 patients.

机构信息

Département d'oto-rhino-laryngologie, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.

Département d'oto-rhino-laryngologie, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; Institute of neuroscience, université catholique de Louvain, avenue Hippocrate, 54, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014 Apr;131(2):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2013.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

There is a high prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in the general population. Several causes of olfactory dysfunction have been reported and this disorder is classically divided into sinonasal and non-sinonasal-related olfactory dysfunction. The aims of this study were firstly, to evaluate the frequency of the various aetiologies of olfactory dysfunction in a population of patients with non-sinonasal-related olfactory dysfunction and secondly, to evaluate the degree of olfactory impairment associated with these various aetiologies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 496 patients with non-sinonasal-related olfactory dysfunction. The aetiology of the olfactory dysfunction was recorded for each patient. The aetiology was determined by a complete clinical assessment, including medical history, complete otorhinolaryngological examination, psychophysical testing of olfactory function, recording of olfactory event-related potentials and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Six groups of patients were defined on the basis of the aetiology of the disease and orthonasal and retronasal psychophysical olfactory performances were evaluated in each group.

RESULTS

Post-infectious and post-traumatic aetiologies were the most common causes, representing 37.9% and 33.1% of patients, respectively, followed by idiopathic (16.3%), congenital (5.9%), toxic (3.4%) and neurological (3.4%) olfactory dysfunction. Anosmia was significantly more frequent in congenital (93.1%) and post-traumatic (62.8%) olfactory dysfunction, whereas hyposmia was more frequent in the post-infectious group (59.6%). Orthonasal and retronasal olfactory function tests were significantly correlated in all groups except for the congenital group.

CONCLUSIONS

The data of this study confirm that the most common causes of non-sinonasal-related olfactory dysfunction are post-infectious and post-traumatic. Post-infectious olfactory dysfunction is mainly observed in middle-aged women and is mainly associated with hyposmia, whereas post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction is mainly observed in young men and is associated with a high rate of anosmia.

摘要

引言和目的

嗅觉功能障碍在普通人群中发病率很高。已报道多种导致嗅觉功能障碍的原因,这种疾病通常分为鼻源性和非鼻源性嗅觉功能障碍。本研究的目的首先是评估非鼻源性嗅觉功能障碍患者中各种病因的频率,其次是评估这些不同病因与嗅觉障碍的相关性。

材料和方法

我们回顾性分析了 496 例非鼻源性嗅觉功能障碍患者的队列。记录每位患者嗅觉功能障碍的病因。通过完整的临床评估(包括病史、完整的耳鼻喉科检查、嗅觉功能的心理物理学测试、嗅觉事件相关电位的记录和脑磁共振成像)确定病因。根据疾病的病因将患者分为六组,并评估每组的嗅味觉和味觉的心理物理学表现。

结果

感染后和创伤后病因是最常见的病因,分别占患者的 37.9%和 33.1%,其次是特发性(16.3%)、先天性(5.9%)、中毒性(3.4%)和神经性(3.4%)嗅觉功能障碍。先天性(93.1%)和创伤后(62.8%)嗅觉功能障碍患者的嗅觉丧失更为常见,而感染后嗅觉功能障碍患者的嗅觉减退更为常见(59.6%)。除先天性组外,所有组的嗅味觉和味觉测试均呈显著相关性。

结论

本研究的数据证实,非鼻源性嗅觉功能障碍的最常见原因是感染后和创伤后。感染后嗅觉功能障碍主要发生在中年女性,主要与嗅觉减退有关,而创伤后嗅觉功能障碍主要发生在年轻男性,与嗅觉丧失率高有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验