Pogge David L, Stokes John, Buccolo Martin L, Pappalardo Stephen, Harvey Philip D
Four Winds Hospital, Katonah, NY, United States; Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, United States.
Pace University, New York, NY, United States.
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Jul;35(7):1705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
Intellectual disability is associated with an increased risk of behavioral disturbances and also complicates their treatment. Despite increases in the sophistication of medical detection of early risk for intellectual disability, there is remarkably little data about the detection of intellectual disability in cases referred for psychiatric treatment. In this study, we used a 10-year sample of 23,629 consecutive child and adolescent admissions (ages between 6 and 17) to inpatient psychiatric treatment. Eleven percent (n=2621) of these cases were referred for psychological assessment and were examined with a general measure of intellectual functioning (i.e., WISC-IV). Of these cases, 16% had Full Scale IQs below 70. Of the cases whose therapists then referred them for formal assessment of their adaptive functioning (i.e., ABAS-II) 81% were found to have composite scores below 70 as well. Only one of the cases whose Full Scale IQ was less than 70 had a referral diagnosis of intellectual disability. Cases with previously undetected intellectual disability were found to be significantly more likely to have a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder and less likely to have a diagnosis of mood disorder than cases with IQs over 70. Disruptive behavior disorder diagnoses did not differ as a function of intellectual performance. These data suggest a high rate of undetected intellectual disability in cases with a psychiatric condition serious enough to require hospitalization and this raises the possibility that many such cases may be misdiagnosed, the basis of their problems may be misconceptualized, and they may be receiving treatments that do not take into account their intellectual level.
智力残疾与行为障碍风险增加相关,且使其治疗复杂化。尽管医学上对智力残疾早期风险的检测日益精细,但关于转介至精神科治疗的病例中智力残疾检测的数据却非常少。在本研究中,我们使用了一个为期10年的样本,该样本包含23629例连续入院接受住院精神科治疗的儿童和青少年(年龄在6至17岁之间)。其中11%(n = 2621)的病例被转介进行心理评估,并接受了智力功能的综合测量(即韦氏儿童智力量表第四版)。在这些病例中,16%的全量表智商低于70。在其治疗师随后将他们转介进行适应性功能正式评估(即第二版适应行为评估系统)的病例中,81%的综合得分也低于70。全量表智商低于70的病例中只有一例被转诊诊断为智力残疾。与智商超过70的病例相比,先前未被发现智力残疾的病例被诊断为精神障碍的可能性显著更高,而被诊断为情绪障碍的可能性更低。破坏性行为障碍的诊断与智力表现无关。这些数据表明,在因精神疾病严重到需要住院治疗的病例中,未被发现的智力残疾发生率很高,这增加了许多此类病例可能被误诊、其问题的根源可能被错误理解以及他们可能正在接受未考虑其智力水平的治疗的可能性。