Vowles Kevin E, Sowden Gail, Ashworth Julie
University of New Mexico & Haywood Hospital.
Haywood Hospital & Keele University.
Behav Ther. 2014 May;45(3):390-401. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.009. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
The therapeutic model underlying Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is reasonably well-established as it applies to chronic pain. Several studies have examined measures of single ACT processes, or subsets of processes, and have almost uniformly indicated reliable relations with patient functioning. To date, however, no study has performed a comprehensive examination of the entire ACT model, including all of its component processes, as it relates to functioning. The present study performed this examination in 274 individuals with chronic pain presenting for an assessment appointment. Participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires, assessing multiple aspects of the ACT model, as well as pain intensity, disability, and emotional distress. Initial exploratory factor analyses examined measures of the ACT model and measures of patient functioning separately with each analysis identifying three factors. Next, the fit of a model including ACT processes on the one hand and patient functioning on the other was examined using Structural Equation Modeling. Overall model fit was acceptable and indicated moderate correlations among the ACT processes themselves, as well as significant relations with pain intensity, emotional distress, and disability. These analyses build on the existing literature by providing, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive evaluation of the ACT theoretical model in chronic pain to date.
接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)背后的治疗模式在应用于慢性疼痛时已得到相当充分的确立。多项研究考察了ACT单个过程或过程子集的测量方法,几乎一致表明其与患者功能存在可靠的关联。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究对整个ACT模型(包括其所有组成过程)与功能的关系进行全面考察。本研究对274名前来接受评估的慢性疼痛患者进行了此项考察。参与者完成了一系列自我报告问卷,评估了ACT模型的多个方面以及疼痛强度、残疾和情绪困扰。最初的探索性因素分析分别考察了ACT模型的测量方法和患者功能的测量方法,每次分析都识别出三个因素。接下来,使用结构方程模型考察了一个一方面包括ACT过程另一方面包括患者功能的模型的拟合度。总体模型拟合度可以接受,表明ACT过程本身之间存在中等程度的相关性,以及与疼痛强度、情绪困扰和残疾存在显著关系。据我们所知,这些分析通过提供迄今为止对慢性疼痛中ACT理论模型最全面的评估,在现有文献的基础上更进一步。