Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM), CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain.
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM), CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain.
Dev Comp Immunol. 2014 Aug;45(2):233-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
Type I interferons (IFNs) are considered the main cytokines directing the antiviral immune response in vertebrates. These molecules are able to induce the transcription of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) which, using different blocking mechanisms, reduce the viral proliferation in the host. In addition, a contradictory role of these IFNs in the protection against bacterial challenges using murine models has been observed, increasing the survival or having a detrimental effect depending on the bacteria species. In teleosts, a variable number of type I IFNs has been described with different expression patterns, protective capabilities or gene induction profiles even for the different IFNs belonging to the same species. In this work, two type I IFNs (ifn1 and ifn2) have been characterized for the first time in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), showing different properties. Whereas Ifn1 reflected a clear antiviral activity (over-expression of ISGs and protection against viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus), Ifn2 was not able to induce this response, although both transcripts were up-regulated after viral challenge. On the other hand, turbot IFNs did not show any protective effect against the bacteria Aeromonas salmonicida, although they were induced after bacterial challenge. Both IFNs induced the expression of several immune genes, but the effect of Ifn2 was mainly limited to the site of administration (intramuscular injection). Interestingly, Ifn2 but not Ifn1 induced an increase in the expression level of interleukin-1 beta (il1b). Therefore, the role of Ifn2 could be more related with the immune regulation, being involved mainly in the inflammation process.
I 型干扰素 (IFNs) 被认为是脊椎动物中指导抗病毒免疫反应的主要细胞因子。这些分子能够诱导干扰素刺激基因 (ISGs) 的转录,ISGs 通过不同的阻断机制减少宿主中的病毒增殖。此外,在使用鼠模型进行细菌挑战时,这些 IFNs 的作用具有矛盾性,其增加了生存机会或产生了有害影响,具体取决于细菌的种类。在硬骨鱼类中,已经描述了数量不等的 I 型 IFNs,其表达模式、保护能力或基因诱导谱存在差异,即使对于属于同一物种的不同 IFNs 也是如此。在这项工作中,首次对大菱鲆 (Scophthalmus maximus) 中的两种 I 型 IFNs(ifn1 和 ifn2)进行了表征,显示出不同的特性。虽然 Ifn1 表现出明显的抗病毒活性(ISGs 的过度表达和对病毒性出血性败血症病毒的保护),但 Ifn2 不能诱导这种反应,尽管两种转录物在病毒攻击后都上调。另一方面,大菱鲆 IFNs 对细菌嗜水气单胞菌没有显示出任何保护作用,尽管在细菌攻击后它们被诱导。两种 IFNs 都诱导了几种免疫基因的表达,但 Ifn2 的作用主要局限于给药部位(肌肉注射)。有趣的是,Ifn2 但不是 Ifn1 诱导了白细胞介素 1β (il1b) 的表达水平增加。因此,Ifn2 的作用可能更多地与免疫调节有关,主要参与炎症过程。