Gruzelier J H, Hirst L, Holmes P, Leach J
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, Lewisham Way, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK.
Trinity/Laban Conservatoire of Music and Dance, London, UK.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Jul;93(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
This is one of a series of investigations comparing two EEG-neurofeedback protocols - Alpha/theta (A/T) and Sensory-Motor Rhythm (SMR) - for performance enhancement in the Arts, here with the focus on music. The original report (Egner and Gruzelier, 2003) established a beneficial outcome for elite conservatoire musicians following A/T training in two investigations. Subsequently this A/T advantage was replicated for both advanced instrumental and novice singing abilities, including improvisation, while SMR training benefited novice performance only (Gruzelier, Holmes et al., 2014). Here we report a replication of the latter study in university instrumentalists who as before were novice singers with one design change - post-training performances were conducted within the tenth final session instead of on a subsequent occasion. As before expert judges rated the domains of Creativity/Musicality, Communication/Presentation and Technique. The proximity to training of the music performances within the last session likely compromised gains from A/T learning, but perhaps reinforced the impact of SMR training efficacy. In support of validation there was evidence of strong within- and across-session A/T learning and positive linear trends for across-session SMR/theta and SMR/beta-2 ratio learning. In support of mediation learning correlated with music performance. The A/T outcome was markedly discrepant from previous studies and should dispel any impression that the hypnogogic state itself is transferred to the performance context. The effects of SMR ratio training are consistent with an impact on lower-order abilities required in novice performance such as sustained attention and memory, and benefiting all three domains of music assessment.
这是一系列调查研究之一,旨在比较两种脑电图神经反馈方案——α/θ(A/T)和感觉运动节律(SMR)——对艺术领域表现提升的作用,这里重点关注音乐领域。原始报告(埃格纳和格鲁泽列尔,2003年)在两项调查中证实,精英音乐学院的音乐家接受A/T训练后取得了有益成果。随后,这种A/T优势在高级器乐演奏和新手歌唱能力(包括即兴演奏)方面都得到了复制,而SMR训练仅对新手表现有益(格鲁泽列尔、霍姆斯等人,2014年)。在此,我们报告对后一项研究的重复,研究对象是大学器乐演奏者,他们和之前一样是新手歌手,只是有一处设计变更——训练后的表演在第十次最后一节课内进行,而非在后续的某个时间。和之前一样,由专业评委对创造力/音乐性、沟通/表现力和技巧等方面进行评分。最后一节课内音乐表演与训练的时间接近,这可能损害了A/T学习带来的收获,但或许增强了SMR训练效果的影响。为支持有效性验证,有证据表明在课程内和跨课程的A/T学习效果显著,以及跨课程的SMR/θ和SMR/β-2比率学习呈现正线性趋势。为支持中介作用,学习与音乐表演相关。A/T的结果与之前的研究明显不同,应该能消除关于催眠状态本身会转移到表演情境中的任何印象。SMR比率训练的效果与对新手表演所需的低阶能力(如持续注意力和记忆力)的影响一致,并且对音乐评估的所有三个方面都有益。