Suppr超能文献

不同窝沟封闭剂剪切粘结强度的比较评估:一项体外研究。

A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of different pits and fissure sealants: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Singh Nitin, Agrawal Govind, Subhash Av, Suneela S, Barabde Aparna S, Kumar G Ajay

机构信息

Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Saraswati Dental College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India e-mail:

Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. Hedgewar Smruti Runna Sewa Mandal's Dental College and Hospital, Hingoli, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Sep 1;14(5):917-23. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1426.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine and compare the shear bond strength of three different pits and fssure sealants to enamel namely, Delton, Clinpro and Z350 Filtek fowable composite.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety permanent molars were divided into three groups of 30 each. Their proximal surfaces were prepared and stored in 37°C ± 5°C normal saline for 24 hours. Sealant buttons were prepared. The specimens were tested in a shear mode (Lloyds LR100K) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The mean and standard deviations were subjected to an analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The mean shear bond strength of samples of Delton was 10.33 MPa; Clinpro was 8.51 MPa and Z350 Filtek fowable was 12.17 MPa. The mean strength of Delton was signifcantly higher as compared to Clinpro whereas the mean strength of Z350 Filtek was signifcantly higher as compared to Delton and Clinpro (Student t-test, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Z350 Filtek fowable composite had maximum shear bond strength than Delton FS sealant followed by Clinpro sealant. Clinical signifcance: In this study, we compare the bond strength of three pits and fssure sealant, Clinpro yielded lower bond strength than Delton. This outcome can be described due to the presence of fllers in Delton, since these particles increase the resistance of the material to abrasion and also increase the mechanical resistance of the material.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是测定并比较三种不同的窝沟封闭剂(即Delton、Clinpro和Z350 Filtek可流动复合树脂)与牙釉质之间的剪切粘结强度。

材料与方法

90颗恒牙被分为三组,每组30颗。制备其邻面并在37°C±5°C的生理盐水中储存24小时。制备封闭剂纽扣。在剪切模式(Lloyds LR100K)下以0.5mm/min的十字头速度对标本进行测试。对均值和标准差进行方差分析。

结果

Delton样本的平均剪切粘结强度为10.33MPa;Clinpro为8.51MPa,Z350 Filtek可流动复合树脂为12.17MPa。与Clinpro相比,Delton的平均强度显著更高,而与Delton和Clinpro相比,Z350 Filtek的平均强度显著更高(学生t检验,p<0.001)。

结论

Z350 Filtek可流动复合树脂的剪切粘结强度高于Delton窝沟封闭剂,其次是Clinpro封闭剂。临床意义:在本研究中,我们比较了三种窝沟封闭剂的粘结强度,Clinpro的粘结强度低于Delton。由于Delton中存在填料,可描述此结果,因为这些颗粒增加了材料的耐磨性并提高了材料的机械阻力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验