Suppr超能文献

一种新型自酸蚀/自黏结窝沟封闭剂的剪切黏结强度和微渗漏

Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of a New Self-etching/Self-adhesive Pit and Fissure Sealant.

作者信息

Schuldt Christoph, Birlbauer Sebastian, Pitchika Vinay, Crispin Alexander, Hickel Reinhard, Ilie Nicoleta, Kühnisch Jan

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2015 Dec;17(6):491-7. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35255.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate shear bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etching/self-adhesive fissure sealant on prismless enamel compared with conventional fissure sealing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 90 extracted third molars were assigned to 3 main groups: group 1: self-etching/self-adhesive sealant, without acid etching; group 2: self-etching/self-adhesive sealant, with prior acid etching; group 3: conventional fissure sealing (control group). After specimen preparation, each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to storage time (1-day water storage, 3-month water storage, and 1-day water storage followed by 5000x thermocycling). The shear bond strength was determined with a universal testing machine, according to ISO standard 29022. Afterwards, the failure mode was analyzed. An additional 24 third molars were used for microleakage assessment. The fissure pattern was sealed in strict accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. After thermocycling, the dye penetration was examined. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-Test at a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

The shear bond strength of the self-etching/self-adhesive fissure sealant without prior acid etching was significantly lower (4.3 MPa) than that of the self-etching/self-adhesive fissure sealant with prior acid etching (17.1 MPa) and the conventional fissure sealing (19.1 MPa). Microleakage was significantly lower in the control group (1.1%) and in the group with the self-etching/self-adhesive sealant with prior acid etching (0.8%) compared to the group that used the self-etching/self-adhesive material alone (49.4%).

CONCLUSION

The self-etching/self-adhesive fissure sealant can be recommended for clinical use when enamel is etched with phosphoric acid. The self-etching/self-adhesive sealant without prior acid etching showed significantly inferior results.

摘要

目的

评估一种新型自酸蚀/自粘结窝沟封闭剂在无棱柱釉质上的剪切粘结强度和微渗漏情况,并与传统窝沟封闭术进行比较。

材料与方法

总共90颗拔除的第三磨牙被分为3个主要组:第1组:自酸蚀/自粘结封闭剂,不进行酸蚀;第2组:自酸蚀/自粘结封闭剂,预先进行酸蚀;第3组:传统窝沟封闭术(对照组)。在制备标本后,根据储存时间(1天储水、3个月储水以及1天储水后进行5000次热循环),每组再分为3个亚组。根据ISO标准29022,使用万能试验机测定剪切粘结强度。之后,分析失效模式。另外使用24颗第三磨牙进行微渗漏评估。严格按照制造商的说明封闭窝沟形态。热循环后,检查染料渗透情况。使用Mann-Whitney U检验在显著性水平0.05下分析数据。

结果

未预先进行酸蚀的自酸蚀/自粘结窝沟封闭剂的剪切粘结强度(4.3MPa)显著低于预先进行酸蚀的自酸蚀/自粘结窝沟封闭剂(17.1MPa)和传统窝沟封闭术(19.1MPa)。与单独使用自酸蚀/自粘结材料的组(49.4%)相比,对照组(1.1%)和预先进行酸蚀的自酸蚀/自粘结封闭剂组(0.8%)的微渗漏显著更低。

结论

当用磷酸蚀刻釉质时,自酸蚀/自粘结窝沟封闭剂可推荐用于临床。未预先进行酸蚀的自酸蚀/自粘结封闭剂显示出明显较差的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验