Gross Christopher E, Haughom Bryan, Chahal Jaskarndip, Holmes George B
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Foot Ankle Spec. 2014 Oct;7(5):387-97. doi: 10.1177/1938640014521831. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the talus is a challenging entity to treat. Poor outcomes remain all too common. The purpose of this systematic review was to: identify and summarize all available evidence for the treatment of talar AVN; provide treatment recommendations; and highlight gaps in the literature.
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE using a unique algorithm. The Oxford Level of Evidence Guidelines and GRADE recommendations were used to rate the quality of evidence and to make treatment recommendations.
19 studies fit the inclusion criteria constituting 321 ankles at final follow-up. The interventions of interest included hindfoot fusion, conservative measures, bone grafting, vascularized bone graft, core decompression, and talar replacement. All studies were Level IV evidence. Due to study quality, imprecise and sparse data, and potential for reporting bias, the quality of evidence is "very low". Studies investigating conservative therapy showed that prolonged protective weight bearing provides the best outcomes in early talar AVN.
Given the "very low" GRADE recommendation, understanding of talar AVN would be significantly altered by higher quality studies. Early talar AVN seems best treated with protected weightbearing and possibly in combination with ESWT. If that fails, core decompression may be an attractive treatment option. Arthrodesis should be saved as a salvage procedure. Future prospective, randomized studies are necessary to guide the conservative and surgical management of talar AVN.
Level II.
距骨缺血性坏死(AVN)是一种治疗颇具挑战性的病症。不良预后仍然极为常见。本系统评价的目的是:识别并总结所有关于距骨AVN治疗的现有证据;提供治疗建议;并突出文献中的空白。
我们使用独特算法检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE。采用牛津证据水平指南和GRADE推荐来评估证据质量并提出治疗建议。
19项研究符合纳入标准,最终随访时共涉及321个踝关节。感兴趣的干预措施包括后足融合、保守治疗、骨移植、带血管蒂骨移植、髓芯减压和距骨置换。所有研究均为IV级证据。由于研究质量、数据不精确且稀少以及存在报告偏倚的可能性,证据质量为“极低”。调查保守治疗的研究表明,早期距骨AVN采用延长保护性负重可获得最佳疗效。
鉴于GRADE推荐为“极低”,高质量研究将显著改变对距骨AVN的认识。早期距骨AVN似乎最好采用保护性负重治疗,可能联合体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)。若治疗失败,髓芯减压可能是一种有吸引力的治疗选择。关节融合术应留作挽救性手术。未来需要进行前瞻性随机研究,以指导距骨AVN的保守和手术治疗。
II级。