Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Program in Neurosciences, and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Champaign, IL, USA.
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 20;5:229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00229. eCollection 2014.
A large and growing body of work, conducted in both brain-intact and brain-damaged populations, has used the free viewing chimeric face test as a measure of hemispheric dominance for the extraction of emotional information from faces. These studies generally show that normal right-handed individuals tend to perceive chimeric faces as more emotional if the emotional expression is presented on the half of the face to the viewer's left ("left hemiface"). However, the mechanisms underlying this lateralized bias remain unclear. Here, we examine the extent to which this bias is driven by right hemisphere processing advantages vs. default scanning biases in a unique way-by changing task demands. In particular, we compare the original task with one in which right-hemisphere-biased processing cannot provide a decision advantage. Our behavioral and eye movement data are inconsistent with the predictions of a default scanning bias account and support the idea that the left hemiface bias found in the chimeric face test is largely due to strategic use of right hemisphere processing mechanisms.
大量且不断增加的工作,无论是在大脑完整还是大脑受损的人群中进行,都使用自由观看嵌合面孔测试作为衡量从面孔中提取情绪信息的半球优势的一种手段。这些研究通常表明,正常的右利手个体如果情绪表达出现在观察者左侧的面部半侧(“左侧半面”),则倾向于将嵌合面孔感知为更情绪化。然而,这种偏侧化偏见的机制仍不清楚。在这里,我们以一种独特的方式——通过改变任务要求——来检查这种偏见在多大程度上是由右半球处理优势驱动的,还是由默认扫描偏见驱动的。特别是,我们将原始任务与一个不能提供决策优势的右半球偏向处理的任务进行比较。我们的行为和眼动数据与默认扫描偏见解释的预测不一致,支持这样一种观点,即嵌合面孔测试中发现的左侧半面偏见主要是由于对右半球处理机制的策略性使用。