Gazzola Anna, Mannu Claudia, Rossi Maura, Laginestra Maria Antonella, Sapienza Maria Rosaria, Fuligni Fabio, Etebari Maryam, Melle Federica, Sabattini Elena, Agostinelli Claudio, Bacci Francesco, Sagramoso Sacchetti Carlo Alberto, Pileri Stefano Aldo, Piccaluga Pier Paolo
Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Ther Adv Hematol. 2014 Apr;5(2):35-47. doi: 10.1177/2040620713519729.
Currently, distinguishing between benign and malignant lymphoid proliferations is based on a combination of clinical characteristics, cyto/histomorphology, immunophenotype and the identification of well-defined chromosomal aberrations. However, such diagnoses remain challenging in 10-15% of cases of lymphoproliferative disorders, and clonality assessments are often required to confirm diagnostic suspicions. In recent years, the development of new techniques for clonality detection has allowed researchers to better characterize, classify and monitor hematological neoplasms. In the past, clonality was primarily studied by performing Southern blotting analyses to characterize rearrangements in segments of the IG and TCR genes. Currently, the most commonly used method in the clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory is polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is an extremely sensitive technique for detecting nucleic acids. This technique is rapid, accurate, specific, and sensitive, and it can be used to analyze small biopsies as well as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. These advantages make PCR-based approaches the current gold standard for IG/TCR clonality testing. Since the completion of the first human genome sequence, there has been a rapid development of technologies to facilitate high-throughput sequencing of DNA. These techniques have been applied to the deep characterization and classification of various diseases, patient stratification, and the monitoring of minimal residual disease. Furthermore, these novel approaches have the potential to significantly improve the sensitivity and cost of clonality assays and post-treatment monitoring of B- and T-cell malignancies. However, more studies will be required to demonstrate the utility, sensitivity, and benefits of these methods in order to warrant their adoption into clinical practice. In this review, recent developments in clonality testing are examined with an emphasis on highly sensitive systems for improving diagnostic workups and minimal residual disease assessments.
目前,区分良性和恶性淋巴样增生是基于临床特征、细胞/组织形态学、免疫表型以及明确的染色体畸变的鉴定。然而,在10%-15%的淋巴增生性疾病病例中,此类诊断仍然具有挑战性,通常需要进行克隆性评估以证实诊断怀疑。近年来,克隆性检测新技术的发展使研究人员能够更好地表征、分类和监测血液系统肿瘤。过去,克隆性主要通过Southern印迹分析来研究,以表征IG和TCR基因片段的重排。目前,临床分子诊断实验室最常用的方法是聚合酶链反应(PCR),这是一种检测核酸的极其灵敏的技术。该技术快速、准确、特异且灵敏,可用于分析小活检标本以及福尔马林固定石蜡包埋样本。这些优点使基于PCR的方法成为目前IG/TCR克隆性检测的金标准。自首次完成人类基因组序列以来,促进DNA高通量测序的技术迅速发展。这些技术已应用于各种疾病的深度表征和分类、患者分层以及微小残留病的监测。此外,这些新方法有可能显著提高B细胞和T细胞恶性肿瘤克隆性检测及治疗后监测的灵敏度和成本。然而,需要更多的研究来证明这些方法的实用性、灵敏度和益处,以便将其应用于临床实践。在本综述中,我们将探讨克隆性检测的最新进展,重点关注用于改善诊断检查和微小残留病评估的高灵敏度系统。