Suppr超能文献

接受缓释地尔硫䓬治疗的三组高血压患者的收缩压反应。

Systolic blood pressure response in three subgroups of hypertensives treated with sustained-release diltiazem.

作者信息

Stallard M P, Park G D, Stewart W H, Waller E S, Covinsky J O

机构信息

Clinical Research Department, Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City, Missouri 64134.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 6:S117-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198812006-00029.

Abstract

Data from a long-term, open-label diltiazem trial were analyzed to test the hypothesis that the magnitude of systolic blood pressure (SBP) response to diltiazem is dependent on pretreatment levels. The study design included a 2- to 4-week placebo period to establish stable qualifying pressures. Patients devoid of significant coexisting diseases with diastolic blood pressures (DBPs) greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg or SBPs greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg were titrated on sustained-release diltiazem (60-180 mg b.i.d.) over 2-6 weeks. Titration goals were greater than or equal to 10% drop in DBP or greater than or equal to 15% in SBP. Patients were followed up to 20 months. Based on pretreatment blood pressure, patients were divided into three subgroups: isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) (SBP/DBP; greater than or equal to 160/less than 95 mm Hg), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) (less than 160/greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg), and combined systolic and diastolic hypertension (CSDH) (greater than or equal to 160/ greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg). SBP changed significantly from baseline for all three groups. However, the percent reduction in SBP was significantly greater for patients with baseline SBP greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg when compared with patients with baseline SBP less than 160 mm Hg (-10.3 +/- 0.7% vs. -4.4 +/- 0.6%). In comparing the ISH and CSDH patient groups, the CSDH group required a larger diltiazem dose to achieve a SBP response similar to the ISH group. Diltiazem was well tolerated with only a 5% dropout due to adverse effects of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对一项长期、开放标签的地尔硫䓬试验数据进行分析,以检验以下假设:地尔硫䓬引起的收缩压(SBP)反应幅度取决于治疗前的血压水平。研究设计包括一个2至4周的安慰剂期,以确立稳定的合格血压。舒张压(DBP)大于或等于95 mmHg或收缩压大于或等于160 mmHg且无显著并存疾病的患者,在2至6周内接受缓释地尔硫䓬(60 - 180 mg,每日两次)滴定治疗。滴定目标为DBP下降大于或等于10%或SBP下降大于或等于15%。对患者随访长达20个月。根据治疗前血压,患者被分为三个亚组:单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)(SBP/DBP;大于或等于160/小于95 mmHg)、单纯舒张期高血压(IDH)(小于160/大于或等于95 mmHg)以及收缩期和舒张期联合高血压(CSDH)(大于或等于160/大于或等于95 mmHg)。三组患者的SBP均较基线有显著变化。然而,与基线SBP小于160 mmHg的患者相比,基线SBP大于或等于160 mmHg的患者SBP降低百分比显著更高(-10.3±0.7%对-4.4±0.6%)。比较ISH和CSDH患者组时,CSDH组需要更大剂量的地尔硫䓬才能达到与ISH组相似的SBP反应。地尔硫䓬耐受性良好,因治疗不良反应导致的脱落率仅为5%。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验