• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受缓释地尔硫䓬治疗的三组高血压患者的收缩压反应。

Systolic blood pressure response in three subgroups of hypertensives treated with sustained-release diltiazem.

作者信息

Stallard M P, Park G D, Stewart W H, Waller E S, Covinsky J O

机构信息

Clinical Research Department, Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City, Missouri 64134.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 6:S117-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198812006-00029.

DOI:10.1097/00005344-198812006-00029
PMID:2468893
Abstract

Data from a long-term, open-label diltiazem trial were analyzed to test the hypothesis that the magnitude of systolic blood pressure (SBP) response to diltiazem is dependent on pretreatment levels. The study design included a 2- to 4-week placebo period to establish stable qualifying pressures. Patients devoid of significant coexisting diseases with diastolic blood pressures (DBPs) greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg or SBPs greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg were titrated on sustained-release diltiazem (60-180 mg b.i.d.) over 2-6 weeks. Titration goals were greater than or equal to 10% drop in DBP or greater than or equal to 15% in SBP. Patients were followed up to 20 months. Based on pretreatment blood pressure, patients were divided into three subgroups: isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) (SBP/DBP; greater than or equal to 160/less than 95 mm Hg), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) (less than 160/greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg), and combined systolic and diastolic hypertension (CSDH) (greater than or equal to 160/ greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg). SBP changed significantly from baseline for all three groups. However, the percent reduction in SBP was significantly greater for patients with baseline SBP greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg when compared with patients with baseline SBP less than 160 mm Hg (-10.3 +/- 0.7% vs. -4.4 +/- 0.6%). In comparing the ISH and CSDH patient groups, the CSDH group required a larger diltiazem dose to achieve a SBP response similar to the ISH group. Diltiazem was well tolerated with only a 5% dropout due to adverse effects of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对一项长期、开放标签的地尔硫䓬试验数据进行分析,以检验以下假设:地尔硫䓬引起的收缩压(SBP)反应幅度取决于治疗前的血压水平。研究设计包括一个2至4周的安慰剂期,以确立稳定的合格血压。舒张压(DBP)大于或等于95 mmHg或收缩压大于或等于160 mmHg且无显著并存疾病的患者,在2至6周内接受缓释地尔硫䓬(60 - 180 mg,每日两次)滴定治疗。滴定目标为DBP下降大于或等于10%或SBP下降大于或等于15%。对患者随访长达20个月。根据治疗前血压,患者被分为三个亚组:单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)(SBP/DBP;大于或等于160/小于95 mmHg)、单纯舒张期高血压(IDH)(小于160/大于或等于95 mmHg)以及收缩期和舒张期联合高血压(CSDH)(大于或等于160/大于或等于95 mmHg)。三组患者的SBP均较基线有显著变化。然而,与基线SBP小于160 mmHg的患者相比,基线SBP大于或等于160 mmHg的患者SBP降低百分比显著更高(-10.3±0.7%对-4.4±0.6%)。比较ISH和CSDH患者组时,CSDH组需要更大剂量的地尔硫䓬才能达到与ISH组相似的SBP反应。地尔硫䓬耐受性良好,因治疗不良反应导致的脱落率仅为5%。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
Systolic blood pressure response in three subgroups of hypertensives treated with sustained-release diltiazem.接受缓释地尔硫䓬治疗的三组高血压患者的收缩压反应。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 6:S117-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198812006-00029.
2
Trough-to-peak ratio and circadian blood pressure profile after treatment with once-daily extended-release diltiazem, 240 mg, in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.轻度至中度原发性高血压患者每日一次服用240毫克缓释地尔硫䓬治疗后的谷峰比值和昼夜血压曲线
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997 Mar;29(3):316-22. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199703000-00003.
3
Efficacy and tolerance of sustained-release diltiazem 300 mg and a diuretic in the elderly.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 1:S51-5.
4
Comparative study on monotherapy with sustained-release diltiazem 300 mg and enalapril 20 mg in mild to moderate arterial hypertension.300毫克缓释地尔硫䓬与20毫克依那普利单药治疗轻至中度动脉高血压的对比研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 1:S46-50.
5
Diuretics versus calcium-channel blockers in systemic hypertension: a preliminary multicenter experience with hydrochlorothiazide and sustained-release diltiazem.利尿剂与钙通道阻滞剂治疗系统性高血压的比较:氢氯噻嗪与缓释地尔硫䓬的初步多中心经验
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Dec 6;56(16):92H-96H. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90551-x.
6
Sustained-release diltiazem: duration of antihypertensive effect.缓释地尔硫䓬:降压作用持续时间。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1989 Jun;29(6):533-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1989.tb03377.x.
7
Comparison of amlodipine and long-acting diltiazem in the treatment of mild or moderate hypertension.氨氯地平和长效地尔硫䓬治疗轻度或中度高血压的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 1997 Nov;10(11):1263-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00264-1.
8
Optimization of antihypertensive therapy with a novel, extended-release formulation of diltiazem: results of a practice-based clinical study.
Clin Ther. 1997 Nov-Dec;19(6):1379-93. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80012-4.
9
Comparison of hydrochlorothiazide and sustained-release diltiazem for mild-to-moderate systemic hypertension.氢氯噻嗪与缓释地尔硫䓬治疗轻至中度系统性高血压的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Mar 1;59(6):615-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91180-5.
10
Clinical experience with a once-daily, extended-release formulation of diltiazem in the treatment of hypertension.
Am J Med. 1992 Aug 31;93(2A):56S-64S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90295-m.

引用本文的文献

1
Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure versus pulse pressure.收缩压与舒张压与脉压
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2002 Nov;4(6):463-7. doi: 10.1007/s11886-002-0107-4.
2
Diltiazem. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in older patients.地尔硫䓬。老年患者药理学及治疗应用综述。
Drugs Aging. 1993 Jul-Aug;3(4):363-90. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199303040-00007.
3
Diltiazem. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.地尔硫䓬。对其药理特性和治疗用途的重新评估。
Drugs. 1990 May;39(5):757-806. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039050-00009.