Suppr超能文献

氢氯噻嗪与缓释地尔硫䓬治疗轻至中度系统性高血压的比较。

Comparison of hydrochlorothiazide and sustained-release diltiazem for mild-to-moderate systemic hypertension.

作者信息

Frishman W H, Zawada E T, Smith L K, Sowers J, Swartz S L, Kirkendall W, Lunn J, McCarron D, Moser M, Schnaper H

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1987 Mar 1;59(6):615-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91180-5.

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of sustained-release diltiazem, 120 to 180 mg twice daily, was compared with those of hydrochlorothiazide, 25 to 50 mg twice daily, in 207 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure [BP] 95 to 114 mm Hg) using a baseline, placebo, parallel-design study protocol. All patients received placebo for 2 to 4 weeks, followed by either study drug during the double-blind phase, titrated over 8 weeks to achieve a goal of supine diastolic BP reduction of at least 10 mm Hg and/or a diastolic BP of less than 90 mm Hg. Patients not achieving the treatment goal with either drug alone received the other drug in combination. Both drugs produced significant decreases in supine and upright BP throughout the 26-week study. The magnitude of decrease in mean supine diastolic BP was similar for both drugs as monotherapy at week 14 (-11.4 and -12.1 mm Hg, respectively). Hydrochlorothiazide produced significantly greater reductions at week 14 in mean supine systolic BP than sustained-release diltiazem (-19.5 and -12.7 mm Hg, respectively). The difference in mean supine diastolic BP reduction with the 2 drugs diminished when hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg/day) was compared with sustained-release diltiazem. The BP effects were sustained for 6 months with both drugs. The 2 drugs appeared to lower BP more in patients older than 60 years and more in black than in white patients. The combination of the 2 drugs decreased supine diastolic BP to goal levels in about 56% of the patients not achieving goal with either drug alone. Adverse effects were minimal with either drug alone and in combination, except for hypokalemia, which increased with thiazide alone and in combination.

摘要

采用基线、安慰剂、平行设计研究方案,对207例轻至中度高血压患者(仰卧位舒张压[BP]为95至114 mmHg)进行研究,比较每日两次服用120至180 mg缓释地尔硫䓬与每日两次服用25至50 mg氢氯噻嗪的安全性和有效性。所有患者接受2至4周的安慰剂治疗,随后在双盲阶段服用其中一种研究药物,在8周内进行滴定,以实现仰卧位舒张压降低至少10 mmHg和/或舒张压低于90 mmHg的目标。单用任何一种药物未达到治疗目标的患者联合使用另一种药物。在整个26周的研究中,两种药物均使仰卧位和直立位血压显著下降。在第14周时,两种药物作为单一疗法时,平均仰卧位舒张压的下降幅度相似(分别为-11.4和-12.1 mmHg)。在第14周时,氢氯噻嗪使平均仰卧位收缩压的降低幅度显著大于缓释地尔硫䓬(分别为-19.5和-12.7 mmHg)。当比较氢氯噻嗪(50 mg/天)与缓释地尔硫䓬时,两种药物在平均仰卧位舒张压降低方面的差异减小。两种药物的血压效应均持续6个月。两种药物在60岁以上患者中似乎降压作用更强,在黑人患者中比白人患者中降压作用更强。两种药物联合使用使约56%单用任何一种药物未达到目标的患者的仰卧位舒张压降至目标水平。单用或联合使用任何一种药物时不良反应均最小,除了低钾血症,低钾血症在单用噻嗪类药物及联合使用时均增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验