Otachi E O, Locke S A, Jirsa F, Fellner-Frank C, Marcogliese D J
University of Vienna, Department of Integrative Zoology,Althanstrasse 14,1090Vienna,Austria.
Aquatic Biodiversity Section, Watershed Hydrology and Ecology Research Division, Water Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada,105 McGill Street,Montreal,QC H2Y 2E7Canada.
J Helminthol. 2015 Jul;89(4):404-14. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X14000170. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
Even in the relatively well-characterized faunas of the developed world, it is difficult to discriminate species of metacercariae in the Diplostomidae using morphology, infection site or host use. The taxonomy, diversity and ecology of diplostomids infecting freshwater fishes in the African continent are particularly poorly known, but recent morphometric and genetic studies have revealed four species of diplostomids in the eyes and brains of siluriform fishes. In the present study, diplostomid metacercariae were collected from the eyes of 288 fish comprising two species within the Cyprinidae (Cyprinus carpio, n = 145, and Barbus paludinosus, n = 67), two Cichlidae (Oreochromis leucostictus, n = 56, and Tilapia zillii, n = 18) and one Centrarchidae (Micropterus salmoides, n = 2) caught in Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Morphometric (14 characters and 8 indices in 111 specimens) and molecular (sequences from the barcode region of the cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene in 11 specimens) data were used to discriminate species. All fish species except B. paludinosus were infected with Tylodelphys metacercariae that were initially separated into two types differing mainly in body length. However, this morphological distinction received only intermediate support in quantitative morphological analysis and molecular data indicated that both morphotypes were conspecific. All the specimens therefore are inferred to belong to a single unidentified species of Tylodelphys, which is not conspecific with any other diplostomid for which comparable molecular data are available, including four diplostomid species known from siluriform fish in Nigeria and Tanzania.
即使在发达国家特征相对明确的动物区系中,利用形态学、感染部位或宿主类型来鉴别双穴科的尾蚴种类也很困难。非洲大陆感染淡水鱼的双穴吸虫的分类学、多样性和生态学尤其鲜为人知,但最近的形态测量和遗传学研究揭示了鲶形目鱼类眼睛和大脑中有四种双穴吸虫。在本研究中,从肯尼亚奈瓦沙湖捕获的288条鱼的眼睛中收集了双穴吸虫尾蚴,这些鱼包括鲤科的两个物种(鲤鱼,n = 145,和沼泽魮,n = 67)、丽鱼科的两个物种(白纹罗非鱼,n = 56,和吉利罗非鱼,n = 18)以及太阳鱼科的一个物种(大口黑鲈,n = 2)。利用形态测量数据(111个标本中的14个特征和8个指数)和分子数据(11个标本中细胞色素c氧化酶1基因条形码区域的序列)来鉴别物种。除沼泽魮外,所有鱼类均感染了泰勒双穴吸虫尾蚴,这些尾蚴最初被分为两种类型,主要区别在于体长。然而,这种形态学上的区分在定量形态分析中仅得到了中等程度的支持,分子数据表明这两种形态型是同种的。因此,所有标本都被推断属于一种未鉴定的泰勒双穴吸虫,它与任何其他有可比分子数据的双穴吸虫都不同种,包括从尼日利亚和坦桑尼亚的鲶形目鱼类中已知的四种双穴吸虫。