• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过对已知疾病或疾病相关等位基因的家系数据进行分层,利用连锁分析来检测基因-基因相互作用。

Using linkage analysis to detect gene-gene interaction by stratifying family data on known disease, or disease-associated, alleles.

作者信息

Corso Barbara, Greenberg David A

机构信息

National Council Research, Neuroscience Institute, Padova, Italy.

Battelle Center for Mathematical Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America; Department of Pediatrics, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 1;9(4):e93398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093398. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093398
PMID:24690899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3972093/
Abstract

Detecting gene-gene interaction in complex diseases is a major challenge for common disease genetics. Most interaction detection approaches use disease-marker associations and such methods have low power and unknown reliability in real data. We developed and tested a powerful linkage-analysis-based gene-gene interaction detection strategy based on conditioning the family data on a known disease-causing allele or disease-associated marker allele. We computer-generated multipoint linkage data for a disease caused by two epistatically interacting loci (A and B). We examined several two-locus epistatic inheritance models: dominant-dominant, dominant-recessive, recessive-dominant, recessive-recessive. At one of the loci (A), there was a known disease-related allele. We stratified the family data on the presence of this allele, eliminating family members who were without it. This elimination step has the effect of raising the "penetrance" at the second locus (B). We then calculated the lod score at the second locus (B) and compared the pre- and post-stratification lod scores at B. A positive difference indicated interaction. We also examined if it was possible to detect interaction with locus B based on a disease-marker association (instead of an identified disease allele) at locus A. We also tested whether the presence of genetic heterogeneity would generate false positive evidence of interaction. The power to detect interaction for a known disease allele was 60-90%. The probability of false positives, based on heterogeneity, was low. Decreasing linkage disequilibrium between the disease and marker at locus A decreased the likelihood of detecting interaction. The allele frequency of the associated marker made little difference to the power.

摘要

在复杂疾病中检测基因-基因相互作用是常见疾病遗传学面临的一项重大挑战。大多数相互作用检测方法使用疾病-标记物关联,而这类方法在实际数据中的效能较低且可靠性未知。我们开发并测试了一种基于连锁分析的强大基因-基因相互作用检测策略,该策略基于对已知致病等位基因或疾病相关标记等位基因的家系数据进行条件设定。我们通过计算机生成了由两个上位性相互作用位点(A和B)导致的疾病的多点连锁数据。我们研究了几种两位点上位性遗传模型:显性-显性、显性-隐性、隐性-显性、隐性-隐性。在其中一个位点(A),存在一个已知与疾病相关的等位基因。我们根据该等位基因的存在对家系数据进行分层,剔除没有该等位基因的家庭成员。这一剔除步骤具有提高第二个位点(B)“外显率”的效果。然后我们计算第二个位点(B)的对数优势分数,并比较B位点分层前后的对数优势分数。正差值表明存在相互作用。我们还研究了是否有可能基于位点A处的疾病-标记物关联(而非已鉴定的疾病等位基因)来检测与位点B的相互作用。我们还测试了遗传异质性的存在是否会产生相互作用的假阳性证据。对于已知疾病等位基因,检测相互作用的效能为60%-90%。基于异质性的假阳性概率较低。位点A处疾病与标记之间连锁不平衡的降低会减少检测到相互作用的可能性。相关标记的等位基因频率对效能影响不大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/8ed4e8905038/pone.0093398.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/77557b1e1e52/pone.0093398.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/524bbf4b6971/pone.0093398.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/49a62374d27c/pone.0093398.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/8ed4e8905038/pone.0093398.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/77557b1e1e52/pone.0093398.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/524bbf4b6971/pone.0093398.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/49a62374d27c/pone.0093398.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0555/3972093/8ed4e8905038/pone.0093398.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Using linkage analysis to detect gene-gene interaction by stratifying family data on known disease, or disease-associated, alleles.通过对已知疾病或疾病相关等位基因的家系数据进行分层,利用连锁分析来检测基因-基因相互作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 1;9(4):e93398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093398. eCollection 2014.
2
Using Linkage Analysis to Detect Gene-Gene Interactions. 2. Improved Reliability and Extension to More-Complex Models.使用连锁分析检测基因-基因相互作用。2. 提高可靠性并扩展到更复杂的模型。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146240. eCollection 2016.
3
A new strategy for linkage analysis under epistasis taking into account genetic heterogeneity.一种考虑遗传异质性的上位性连锁分析新策略。
Hum Hered. 2009;68(4):231-42. doi: 10.1159/000228921. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
4
Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.通过多点分析确定性状位点位置:三种不同统计方法的准确性和效能
Genet Epidemiol. 2001 Dec;21(4):299-314. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1036.
5
A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.一项将最大多点异质性LOD统计量的精度与三种无模型多点连锁方法进行比较的研究。
Genet Epidemiol. 2001 Dec;21(4):315-25. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1037.
6
Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci.分区关联-连锁检验:区分“必需”基因座与“易感”基因座。
Genet Epidemiol. 1996;13(3):243-52. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:3<243::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-7.
7
Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.复杂疾病连锁分析中简单对数优势比分(LOD)分数与正态乘积统计量(NPL)分数之间的直接功效比较。
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Sep;65(3):847-57. doi: 10.1086/302536.
8
Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits: extension to multigenerational pedigree structures.寡基因性状连锁分析中单基因座近似法的充分性:扩展到多代系谱结构
Hum Hered. 1993 Nov-Dec;43(6):329-36. doi: 10.1159/000154155.
9
Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.存在误差情况下的连锁分析III:作为干扰参数的标记位点及其图谱
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Apr;66(4):1298-309. doi: 10.1086/302846. Epub 2000 Mar 23.
10
Comparison of a multipoint identity-by-descent method with parametric multipoint linkage analysis for mapping quantitative traits.用于定位数量性状的多点同源等位基因方法与参数化多点连锁分析的比较。
Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Mar;50(3):598-606.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying genetic risk loci for diabetic complications and showing evidence for heterogeneity of type 1 diabetes based on complications risk.确定糖尿病并发症的遗传风险位点,并基于并发症风险证明1型糖尿病的异质性。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192696. eCollection 2018.
2
Using Linkage Analysis to Detect Gene-Gene Interactions. 2. Improved Reliability and Extension to More-Complex Models.使用连锁分析检测基因-基因相互作用。2. 提高可靠性并扩展到更复杂的模型。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146240. eCollection 2016.
3
Linkage Analysis of Genomic Regions Contributing to the Expression of Type 1 Diabetes Microvascular Complications and Interaction with HLA.

本文引用的文献

1
Computer simulation is an undervalued tool for genetic analysis: a historical view and presentation of SHIMSHON--a Web-based genetic simulation package.计算机模拟是基因分析中一种被低估的工具:基于历史视角对SHIMSHON(一个基于网络的基因模拟软件包)的介绍
Hum Hered. 2011;72(4):247-57. doi: 10.1159/000330633. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
2
Novel loci interacting epistatically with bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 cause familial pulmonary arterial hypertension.与骨形态发生蛋白受体 2 呈上位性相互作用的新基因座导致家族性肺动脉高压。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Feb;29(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.08.022. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
3
1型糖尿病微血管并发症表达相关基因组区域的连锁分析及其与HLA的相互作用
J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:694107. doi: 10.1155/2015/694107. Epub 2015 Oct 11.
Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases.
检测人类疾病相关的基因-基因相互作用。
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jun;10(6):392-404. doi: 10.1038/nrg2579.
4
Genetic association analysis: a primer on how it works, its strengths and its weaknesses.基因关联分析:关于其工作原理、优势与劣势的入门介绍。
Int J Androl. 2008 Dec;31(6):546-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00896.x. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
5
Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.通过多点分析确定性状位点位置:三种不同统计方法的准确性和效能
Genet Epidemiol. 2001 Dec;21(4):299-314. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1036.
6
Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.复杂疾病连锁分析中简单对数优势比分(LOD)分数与正态乘积统计量(NPL)分数之间的直接功效比较。
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Sep;65(3):847-57. doi: 10.1086/302536.
7
Faster multipoint linkage analysis using Fourier transforms.使用傅里叶变换进行更快的多点连锁分析。
J Comput Biol. 1998 Spring;5(1):1-7. doi: 10.1089/cmb.1998.5.1.
8
Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: a simulation study.单基因座连锁分析在多种模型上最大化时的I型错误大小:一项模拟研究。
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan;60(1):217-27.
9
Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach.参数和非参数连锁分析:一种统一的多点方法。
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1347-63.
10
Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results.复杂性状的基因剖析:解读和报告连锁结果的指南。
Nat Genet. 1995 Nov;11(3):241-7. doi: 10.1038/ng1195-241.