Deftereos Spyridon, Kossyvakis Charalampos, Efremidis Michael, Bouras Georgios, Panagopoulou Vasiliki, Papadimitriou Charalampos, Doudoumis Konstantinos, Deftereos Gerasimos, Synetos Andreas, Davlouros Periklis, Toutouzas Konstantinos, Alexopoulos Dimitrios, Manolis Antonis S, Giannopoulos Georgios
Department of Cardiology, Athens General Hospital "G. Gennimatas," Athens, Greece; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Cardiology, Athens General Hospital "G. Gennimatas," Athens, Greece; Hellenic Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Athens, Greece.
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jul;11(7):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.053. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
Atrial electrical conduction properties have been implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF) pathogenesis.
The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the potential association of interatrial conduction time (IACT) with incident AF.
The study included persons referred for invasive electrophysiologic study (EPS), aged ≥50 years, without AF history or valvular disease. IACT was defined as the interval between the high right atrium electrogram and the distal coronary sinus atrial electrogram.
Six hundred twelve subjects were included (median follow-up 43 months, interquartile range 40-47). AF incidence was 21.7 cases per 1000 person-years. IACT was a significant predictor of AF with a c-statistic of 0.770 (95% confidence interval 0.702-0.838). In time-dependent analysis, IACT was a significant stratifier of AF risk (log-rank 28.0, P <.001). The corresponding incidences of AF in each tertile of IACT were 3, 17, and 46 per 1000 person-years, respectively (all differences between tertiles were significant). IACT remained significant in multivariable Cox regression analysis, after adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, and left atrial diameter, with each millisecond of prolonged IACT corresponding to 7% (95% confidence interval 2%-12%) higher adjusted risk of incident AF.
IACT is independently associated with incident AF. The invasive nature of the measurement is a limitation for its use as a clinical risk stratifier (although it could be used in patients referred for EPS), but these results are of interest in themselves because they suggest a strong pathophysiologic connection between atrial conduction times and substrate alterations ultimately leading to AF.
心房电传导特性与心房颤动(AF)的发病机制有关。
本研究的目的是前瞻性评估房间传导时间(IACT)与新发AF之间的潜在关联。
该研究纳入年龄≥50岁、无AF病史或瓣膜疾病且接受有创电生理检查(EPS)的患者。IACT定义为高位右房电图与远端冠状窦心房电图之间的间期。
共纳入612名受试者(中位随访43个月,四分位间距40 - 47个月)。AF发病率为每1000人年21.7例。IACT是AF的显著预测因子,c统计量为0.770(95%置信区间0.702 - 0.838)。在时间依赖性分析中,IACT是AF风险的显著分层因素(对数秩检验χ² = 28.0,P <.001)。IACT三分位数中AF的相应发病率分别为每1000人年3例、17例和46例(各三分位数之间的差异均有统计学意义)。在对年龄、性别、高血压和左房直径进行调整后,IACT在多变量Cox回归分析中仍具有显著性,IACT每延长1毫秒,新发AF的校正风险就相应增加7%(95%置信区间2% - 12%)。
IACT与新发AF独立相关。测量方法的有创性限制了其作为临床风险分层指标的应用(尽管可用于接受EPS的患者),但这些结果本身很有意义,因为它们提示心房传导时间与最终导致AF的基质改变之间存在密切的病理生理联系。