Akyürek O, Sayin T, Dinçer I, Karaoguz R, Güldal M, Oral D
Department of Cardiology, Medical School, Ankara University, Turkey.
Jpn Heart J. 2001 Sep;42(5):575-84. doi: 10.1536/jhj.42.575.
Intraatrial conduction delay in atrial fibrillation (AF) that is considered a component of atrial electrical remodeling has been demonstrated previously in experimental models and it is considered an important factor for the induction or stabilization of AF. However, it is not known if this phenomenon exists in human AF. The present study aimed to compare intraatrial conduction time (IACT) in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who were converted to sinus rhythm and a matched control group, and to investigate its relation with early AF recurrence. Seventeen patients with chronic AF (mean duration of 20.71+/-16.35 months) were enrolled in the study (7 males, 10 females, 63+/-8 years). An age and sex matched control group (n=12) consisted of patients with sinus rhythm who underwent electrophysiological study (EPS). None of the patients were on any antiarrhythmic treatment during the procedures. Cardioversion was performed via external DC cardioversion. Eight patients in the control group were delivered a DC shock because of induced ventricular tachycardia during EPS. IACT was defined as the interval between the onset of P wave surface ECG and the beginning of A wave at high right atrium (IACT 1) and low right atrium (IACT 2). Additionally, the interval between A wave at high right atrium and low right atrium was measured (IACT 3). Patient characteristics such as age, sex and echocardiographic variables were not different between the AF group and the control group. Heart rate after cardioversion was found to be similar between the two groups. Total delivered energy was significantly higher in the AF group than in the control group (464.47+/-165.82 joules vs. 315.00+/-27.77 joules, p<0.001). IACT 1 (15.30+/-7.61 msec vs 8.50+/-5.29 msec, p<0.02 ), IACT 2 (45.25+/-836 msec vs 26.44+/-10.45 msec, p<0.001) and IACT 3 (26.9+/-8.26 msec vs. 18.67+/-10.05, p<0.05) significantly lengthened in the AF group after maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to the control group. There were 6 early AF recurrences during the 1 week follow-up period. Multivariate analysis, revealed IACT 2 and IACT 3 were significantly different between the control group, the patient with recurred AF and the patients with maintained sinus rhythm. Post-hoc analysis revealed that IACT 2 and IACT 3 significantly lengthened in the patients with recurred AF compared to both the control group and patients with maintained sinus rhythm. On the other hand, only IACT 2 patients with maintained sinus rhythm were found to be higher than those of the control group. The present study indicated that intraatrial conduction was disturbed in patients with AF, a finding which is consistent with those of previous experimental studies. Additionally, such a phenomenon may be a risk factor for the early recurrence of AF after cardioversion to sinus rhythm.
心房颤动(AF)中的心房内传导延迟被认为是心房电重构的一个组成部分,此前已在实验模型中得到证实,并且被认为是诱发或稳定房颤的一个重要因素。然而,尚不清楚这种现象是否存在于人类房颤中。本研究旨在比较转复为窦性心律的慢性房颤患者与匹配的对照组的心房内传导时间(IACT),并研究其与房颤早期复发的关系。17例慢性房颤患者(平均病程20.71±16.35个月)纳入本研究(男性7例,女性10例,年龄63±8岁)。一个年龄和性别匹配的对照组(n=12)由接受电生理研究(EPS)的窦性心律患者组成。在检查过程中,所有患者均未接受任何抗心律失常治疗。通过体外直流电复律进行转复。对照组中有8例患者因在EPS期间诱发室性心动过速而接受了直流电电击。IACT被定义为体表心电图P波起始与高位右心房(IACT 1)和低位右心房(IACT 2)A波起始之间的间期。此外,还测量了高位右心房和低位右心房A波之间的间期(IACT 3)。房颤组和对照组之间的患者特征如年龄、性别和超声心动图变量无差异。转复后两组的心率相似。房颤组的总释放能量显著高于对照组(464.47±165.82焦耳对315.00±27.77焦耳,p<0.001)。与对照组相比,房颤组在维持窦性心律后IACT 1(15.30±7.61毫秒对8.50±5.29毫秒,p<0.02)、IACT 2(45.25±8.36毫秒对26.44±10.45毫秒,p<0.001)和IACT 3(26.9±8.26毫秒对18.67±10.05,p<0.05)显著延长。在1周的随访期内有6例早期房颤复发。多因素分析显示,对照组、房颤复发患者和维持窦性心律患者之间的IACT 2和IACT 3有显著差异。事后分析显示,与对照组和维持窦性心律的患者相比,房颤复发患者的IACT 2和IACT 3显著延长。另一方面,仅发现维持窦性心律患者的IACT 2高于对照组。本研究表明,房颤患者存在心房内传导障碍,这一发现与先前的实验研究结果一致。此外,这种现象可能是房颤转复为窦性心律后早期复发的一个危险因素。