Adamo Shelley A
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
Integr Comp Biol. 2014 Sep;54(3):419-26. doi: 10.1093/icb/icu005. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
Intense, short-term stress (i.e., robust activation of the fight-or-flight response) typically produces a transient decline in resistance to disease in animals across phyla. Chemical mediators of the stress response (e.g., stress hormones) help induce this decline, suggesting that this transient immunosuppression is an evolved response. However, determining the function of stress hormones on immune function is difficult because of their complexity. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that stress hormones help maintain maximal resistance to disease during the physiological changes needed to optimize the body for intense physical activity. Work on insects demonstrates that stress hormones both shunt resources away from the immune system during fight-or-flight responses as well as reconfigure the immune system. Reconfiguring the immune system minimizes the impact of the loss of these resources and reduces the increased costs of some immune functions due to the physiological changes demanded by the fight-or-flight response. For example, during the stress response of the cricket Gryllus texensis, some molecular resources are shunted away from the immune system and toward lipid transport, resulting in a reduction in resistance to disease. However, insects' immune cells (hemocytes) have receptors for octopamine (the insect stress neurohormone). Octopamine increases many hemocyte functions, such as phagocytosis, and these changes would tend to mitigate the decline in immunity due to the loss of molecular resources. Moreover, because the stress response generates oxidative stress, some immune responses are probably more costly when activated during a stress response (e.g., those that produce reactive molecules). Some of these immune responses are depressed during stress in crickets, while others, whose costs are probably not increased during a stress response, are enhanced. Some effects of stress hormones on immune systems may be better understood as examples of reconfiguration rather than as mediating a trade-off.
强烈的短期应激(即“战斗或逃跑”反应的强烈激活)通常会导致各门类动物对疾病的抵抗力暂时下降。应激反应的化学介质(如应激激素)有助于引发这种下降,这表明这种短暂的免疫抑制是一种进化而来的反应。然而,由于应激激素的复杂性,确定其对免疫功能的作用很困难。尽管如此,有证据表明,应激激素有助于在使身体为剧烈体力活动进行优化所需的生理变化过程中维持对疾病的最大抵抗力。对昆虫的研究表明,应激激素在“战斗或逃跑”反应期间既会将资源从免疫系统转移开,也会对免疫系统进行重新配置。对免疫系统进行重新配置可将这些资源损失的影响降至最低,并降低“战斗或逃跑”反应所要求的生理变化导致的某些免疫功能增加的成本。例如,在德州蟋的应激反应过程中,一些分子资源会从免疫系统转移到脂质运输方面,从而导致对疾病的抵抗力下降。然而,昆虫的免疫细胞(血细胞)具有章鱼胺(昆虫应激神经激素)的受体。章鱼胺会增强许多血细胞功能,如吞噬作用,而这些变化往往会减轻由于分子资源损失而导致的免疫力下降。此外,由于应激反应会产生氧化应激,一些免疫反应在应激反应期间被激活时可能成本更高(例如那些产生活性分子的反应)。在蟋蟀应激期间,其中一些免疫反应会受到抑制,而其他一些在应激反应期间成本可能不会增加的免疫反应则会增强。应激激素对免疫系统的一些影响可能更应被理解为重新配置的例子,而不是介导一种权衡。