Almalik Osama, Nijhuis Michiel B, van den Heuvel Edwin R
a Hogeschool HAS , Den Bosch , The Netherlands.
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):493-506. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888439.
Shelf-life estimation usually requires that at least three registration batches are tested for stability at multiple storage conditions. The shelf-life estimates are often obtained by linear regression analysis per storage condition, an approach implicitly suggested by ICH guideline Q1E. A linear regression analysis combining all data from multiple storage conditions was recently proposed in the literature when variances are homogeneous across storage conditions. The combined analysis is expected to perform better than the separate analysis per storage condition, since pooling data would lead to an improved estimate of the variation and higher numbers of degrees of freedom, but this is not evident for shelf-life estimation. Indeed, the two approaches treat the observed initial batch results, the intercepts in the model, and poolability of batches differently, which may eliminate or reduce the expected advantage of the combined approach with respect to the separate approach. Therefore, a simulation study was performed to compare the distribution of simulated shelf-life estimates on several characteristics between the two approaches and to quantify the difference in shelf-life estimates. In general, the combined statistical analysis does estimate the true shelf life more consistently and precisely than the analysis per storage condition, but it did not outperform the separate analysis in all circumstances.
货架期估计通常要求至少对三个注册批次在多个储存条件下进行稳定性测试。货架期估计通常通过对每个储存条件进行线性回归分析来获得,这是国际协调会议(ICH)指南Q1E隐含建议的一种方法。最近文献中提出,当不同储存条件下的方差相同时,可对多个储存条件下的所有数据进行线性回归分析。预计合并分析比每个储存条件单独分析的效果更好,因为合并数据会使变异估计得到改善且自由度增加,但这在货架期估计中并不明显。实际上,这两种方法在处理观察到的初始批次结果、模型中的截距以及批次的可合并性方面有所不同,这可能会消除或减少合并方法相对于单独方法预期的优势。因此,进行了一项模拟研究,以比较两种方法在几个特征上模拟货架期估计的分布,并量化货架期估计的差异。总体而言,合并统计分析确实比每个储存条件单独分析更一致、精确地估计真实货架期,但在所有情况下它并不都优于单独分析。