• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ProTaper和Mtwo再治疗系统在根管再治疗过程中去除树脂类根管充填材料的比较。

Comparison of ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment systems in the removal of resin-based root canal obturation materials during retreatment.

作者信息

Iriboz Emre, Sazak Öveçoğlu Hesna

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Aust Endod J. 2014 Apr;40(1):6-11. doi: 10.1111/aej.12011. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1111/aej.12011
PMID:24697958
Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of the ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment systems for removal of resin-based obturation techniques during retreatment. A total of 160 maxillary anterior teeth were enlarged to size 30 using ProTaper and Mtwo rotary instruments. Teeth were randomly divided into eight groups. Resilon + Epiphany, gutta-percha + Epiphany, gutta-percha + AH Plus and gutta-percha + Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer (PCS) combinations were used for obturation. ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment files were used for removal of root canal treatments. After clearing the roots, the teeth were split vertically into halves, and the cleanliness of the canal walls was determined by scanning electron microscopy. Specimens obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr PCS displayed significantly more remnant obturation material than did specimens filled with resin-based obturation materials. Teeth prepared with Mtwo instruments contained significantly more remnant filling material than did teeth prepared with ProTaper. ProTaper files were significantly faster than Mtwo instruments in terms of the mean time of retreatment and time required to reach working length. The Resilon + Epiphany and AH Plus + gutta-percha obturation materials were removed more easily than were the Epiphany + gutta-percha and Kerr PCS + gutta-percha obturation materials. Although ProTaper retreatment files worked faster than did Mtwo retreatment files in terms of removing root canal obturation materials, both retreatment systems are effective, reliable and fast.

摘要

评估ProTaper和Mtwo再治疗系统在再治疗过程中去除树脂类根管充填材料的效果。使用ProTaper和Mtwo旋转器械将160颗上颌前牙扩大至30号。将牙齿随机分为八组。采用Resilon+Epiphany、牙胶尖+Epiphany、牙胶尖+AH Plus和牙胶尖+Kerr牙髓根管封闭剂(PCS)组合进行根管充填。使用ProTaper和Mtwo再治疗锉去除根管充填物。清理根管后,将牙齿垂直劈成两半,通过扫描电子显微镜确定根管壁的清洁度。与使用树脂类充填材料的标本相比,用牙胶尖和Kerr PCS充填的标本显示出更多的残余充填材料。用Mtwo器械预备的牙齿比用ProTaper预备的牙齿含有更多的残余充填材料。就再治疗平均时间和达到工作长度所需时间而言,ProTaper锉比Mtwo器械明显更快。与Epiphany+牙胶尖和Kerr PCS+牙胶尖充填材料相比,Resilon+Epiphany和AH Plus+牙胶尖充填材料更容易被去除。尽管在去除根管充填材料方面ProTaper再治疗锉比Mtwo再治疗锉工作得更快,但两种再治疗系统都是有效、可靠且快速的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment systems in the removal of resin-based root canal obturation materials during retreatment.ProTaper和Mtwo再治疗系统在根管再治疗过程中去除树脂类根管充填材料的比较。
Aust Endod J. 2014 Apr;40(1):6-11. doi: 10.1111/aej.12011. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
2
Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals.三种不同旋转锉去除根管内牙胶和 Resilon 的效果比较。
Int Endod J. 2010 Nov;43(11):1022-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01758.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
3
Effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing a new synthetic polymer-based root canal obturation material (Epiphany) during retreatment.在根管再治疗过程中,手用器械和旋转器械去除新型合成聚合物基根管充填材料(Epiphany)的效果。
Int Endod J. 2006 Feb;39(2):150-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01066.x.
4
Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.使用ProTaper和Mtwo旋转镍钛再治疗器械及手动锉去除根管充填材料时根尖裂纹起始和扩展的发生率。
J Endod. 2014 Jul;40(7):1009-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.020. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
5
An in vitro comparison between the apical sealing abilities of resilon with Epiphany sealer and gutta-percha with AH plus sealer.Resilon与Epiphany封闭剂以及牙胶尖与AH plus封闭剂根尖封闭能力的体外比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):694. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107415.
6
An in vitro evaluation of performance of two electronic root canal length measurement devices during retreatment of different obturating materials.两种电子根管长度测量仪在不同充填材料再治疗中的性能的体外评估。
J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1526-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
7
The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers.ProTaper Universal 机用镍钛器械用于移除几种根管封闭剂黏固的单根管牙胶尖的效果。
Int Endod J. 2012 Aug;45(8):756-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02032.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
8
In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent.体外评估 ProTaper 通用旋转根管再治疗系统在有无溶剂条件下去除牙胶的有效性。
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1580-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.015.
9
Comparative analysis of efficacy and cleaning ability of hand and rotary devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment: an in vitro study.根管再治疗中手用器械和旋转器械去除牙胶效果及清洁能力的比较分析:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Jul 1;14(4):635-43. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1377.
10
Time required to remove guttacore, thermafil plus, and thermoplasticized gutta-percha from moderately curved root canals with protaper files.用 Protaper 锉去除中度弯曲根管中的 guttacore、Thermafil Plus 和塑化热牙胶所需的时间。
J Endod. 2013 Jan;39(1):125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Endodontic Files in Root Canal Retreatment: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.根管锉在根管再治疗中的疗效:体外研究的系统评价
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Aug 14;16(8):293. doi: 10.3390/jfb16080293.
2
A comparative evaluation of two rotary Ni-Ti instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during retreatment.两种旋转镍钛器械在根管再治疗时去除牙胶的比较评价
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Aug;6(Suppl 2):S131-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.189740.