• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人新鲜囊内股骨颈骨折Garden分型及治疗中观察者间差异的评估

Assessment of interobserver variation in Garden classification and management of fresh intracapsular femoral neck fracture in adults.

作者信息

Aggarwal Amit, Singh Mahipal, Aggarwal Aditya N, Bhatt Shuchi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences, Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi 110095, India.

出版信息

Chin J Traumatol. 2014 Apr 1;17(2):99-102.

PMID:24698579
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the interobserver agreement on Garden classification of fresh femoral neck fracture and management plan based on anteroposterior (AP) view and also assess if the addition of lateral view changes the classification and management plan.

METHODS

Ten orthopaedic surgeons were asked to classify 35 femoral neck fractures on AP view only and propose the management plan. Then the same films were reshown in conjunction with their lateral view after 10 days. Results were compared with respect to the classification and management plan between two groups. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Fleiss' kappa.

RESULTS

There was only a fair interobserver agreement (kappa value 0.39) on Garden classification on AP view only which improved to moderate agreement (kappa value 0.52) after adding a lateral view. While there was only a slight improvement in the interobserver agreement on the management plan on AP view only (kappa value 0.50) and AP combined with lateral views (kappa value 0.52). Supplementation of the lateral view changed the classification in 15.42% of the cases and altered the management plan in 23.14% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that lateral view should be obtained routinely on all patients with suspected femoral neck fracture as it definitely has a role in planning treatment of femoral neck fracture.

摘要

目的

基于前后位(AP)X线片评估不同观察者对新鲜股骨颈骨折Garden分型及处理方案的一致性,并评估增加侧位X线片是否会改变骨折分型及处理方案。

方法

邀请10名骨科医生仅根据AP位X线片对35例股骨颈骨折进行分型并提出处理方案。10天后,将相同的X线片与侧位片一起重新展示给他们。比较两组在骨折分型和处理方案方面的结果。采用Fleiss' kappa计算观察者间的一致性。

结果

仅根据AP位X线片进行Garden分型时,观察者间一致性一般(kappa值为0.39),增加侧位片后一致性提高至中等(kappa值为0.52)。仅根据AP位X线片制定处理方案时观察者间一致性略有提高(kappa值为0.50),AP位片结合侧位片时一致性为(kappa值为0.52)。补充侧位片后,15.42%的病例骨折分型发生改变,23.14%的病例处理方案发生改变。

结论

我们得出结论,对于所有疑似股骨颈骨折的患者,应常规拍摄侧位X线片,因为其在股骨颈骨折治疗方案的制定中确实具有重要作用。

相似文献

1
Assessment of interobserver variation in Garden classification and management of fresh intracapsular femoral neck fracture in adults.成人新鲜囊内股骨颈骨折Garden分型及治疗中观察者间差异的评估
Chin J Traumatol. 2014 Apr 1;17(2):99-102.
2
The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of femoral neck fractures in the geriatric patient.计算机断层扫描在老年患者股骨颈骨折诊断与治疗中的作用。
Orthopedics. 2011 Jan 1;34(2):87. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20101221-18.
3
AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems of femoral neck fractures: are they reliable and reproducible?股骨颈骨折的AO组、AO亚组、Garden和Pauwels分类系统:它们可靠且可重复吗?
Med Glas (Zenica). 2012 Aug;9(2):243-7.
4
Observer assessment of femoral neck radiographs after reduction and dynamic hip screw fixation.复位及动力髋螺钉固定后股骨颈X线片的观察者评估
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Apr;125(3):160-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0780-4. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
5
The impact of the garden classification on proposed operative treatment.花园分类对拟行手术治疗的影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Apr(409):232-40. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000059583.08469.e5.
6
Does a traction-internal rotation radiograph help to better evaluate fractures of the proximal femur?牵引内旋X线片有助于更好地评估股骨近端骨折吗?
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(2):102-6.
7
Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications.股骨颈骨折:影像学分类的可靠性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 25;22(Suppl 2):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05007-3.
8
[Are lateral view radiographs necessary to properly classify femoral neck fractures? Intra and interobserver analysis using Garden's classification system].[股骨颈骨折的正确分类是否需要髋关节侧位X线片?采用Garden分类系统的观察者内和观察者间分析]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2021 Mar 29;78(1):41-44. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v78.n1.30732.
9
Is surgeons' experience important on intra- and inter-observer reliability of classifications used for adult femoral neck fracture?外科医生的经验对于成人股骨颈骨折分类的观察者内和观察者间可靠性是否重要?
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Dec;50(6):601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
10
The reliability of a simplified Garden classification for intracapsular hip fractures.囊内型髋部骨折简化 Garden 分类的可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Jun;98(4):405-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications.股骨颈骨折:影像学分类的可靠性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 25;22(Suppl 2):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05007-3.
2
[Are lateral view radiographs necessary to properly classify femoral neck fractures? Intra and interobserver analysis using Garden's classification system].[股骨颈骨折的正确分类是否需要髋关节侧位X线片?采用Garden分类系统的观察者内和观察者间分析]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2021 Mar 29;78(1):41-44. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v78.n1.30732.
3
The clinical application of a novel method of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures-dynamic locking compression system.
一种用于股骨颈骨折的新型内固定方法——动力锁定加压系统的临床应用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 May 31;13(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0827-9.
4
[Clinical application of computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation system based on error correction method for femoral neck fractures].基于误差校正方法的股骨颈骨折计算机辅助空心钉内固定系统的临床应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 15;31(3):257-261. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201611066.
5
Classifications in Brief: Garden Classification of Femoral Neck Fractures.简要分类:股骨颈骨折的Garden分类
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):441-445. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000066.