Rohlfsen Leah S, Jacobs Kronenfeld Jennie
Department of Sociology, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY, USA
Sociology Program, Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
J Aging Health. 2014 Jun;26(4):637-662. doi: 10.1177/0898264314527477. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
This research examined gender differences in self-rated health (SRH) using the differential exposure and differential vulnerability explanations of gender differences in health.
Trajectories of SRH were estimated using data that spanned 12 years (1992-2004) from the Health and Retirement Study.
There was no gender difference in SRH at baseline, but SRH declined faster for males over time. Factors that mediated the gender difference included changes in employment status, smoking behavior, and the onset of health conditions. Moreover, were it not for gender differences in various structural and health status factors, females would have better SRH at baseline and over time.
Our results differ from previous research, which often shows a female disadvantage that is reduced or disappears at older ages. Furthermore, gender differences in the predictors of SRH (exposure) contribute more to understanding gender differences in SRH than different responses to the predictors (vulnerability).
本研究运用健康方面性别差异的差异暴露和差异易感性解释,考察自评健康(SRH)中的性别差异。
使用来自健康与退休研究的长达12年(1992 - 2004年)的数据估计SRH轨迹。
基线时SRH不存在性别差异,但随着时间推移男性的SRH下降得更快。介导性别差异的因素包括就业状况变化、吸烟行为和健康状况的出现。此外,若不存在各种结构和健康状况因素方面的性别差异,女性在基线时及随时间推移的SRH会更好。
我们的结果与先前研究不同,先前研究通常显示女性处于劣势,且这种劣势在老年时会减轻或消失。此外,SRH预测因素(暴露)中的性别差异比预测因素的不同反应(易感性)对理解SRH中的性别差异贡献更大。