Koktekir Ender, Ceylan Davut, Tatarli Necati, Karabagli Hakan, Recber Fahri, Akdemir Gokhan
Selcuk Universitesi, Tip Fakultesi, Alaaddin Keykubat Kampusu, Norosirurji Klinigi, Konya, Turkey.
Sakarya Universitesi, Tip Fakultesi, Korucuk Mahallesi Konuralp Bulvarı, Norosirurji Klinigi, Sakarya, Turkey.
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1702-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.044. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 1,218 pedicle screws for accuracy, with postoperative computed tomography (CT), in 198 patients who were operated on between March 2004 and September 2012. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of screw misplacement in patients who received a transpedicular screw fixation, with intraoperative fluoroscopy in the lateral and lateral with anteroposterior (AP) positions. The results are compared between the two groups. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study of accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic and lumbar spine. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample consists of 198 consecutive patients who underwent transpedicular screw fixation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of screw placement was evaluated by postoperative CT scan. Misplacement was defined in cases where more than 25% of the screw size was residing outside the pedicle. METHODS: The indications for hardware placement, radiologic studies, patient demographics, and reoperation rates were recorded. Five hundred twenty-eight screws (Group A, n=81) were inserted into the vertebral body with the assistance of lateral fluoroscopy only, whereas 690 screws (Group B, n=117) were inserted with the assistance of lateral fluoroscopy, and the final positions of the screws were checked with AP fluoroscopy. RESULTS: A total of 1,218 screws were analyzed, with 962 screws placed at the lumbosacral region and 256 screws at the thoracic region. According to the postoperative CT scan, 27 screws (2.2%) were identified as breaching the pedicle. Nineteen of them (3.6%) were in Group A, whereas 8 (1.16%) were in Group B. The rate of pedicle breaches was significantly different between Group A and B (p=.0052). In Group A, the lateral violation of the pedicle was seen in 10 screws (1.9%), whereas medial violation was seen in 9 screws (1.7%). In Group B, the lateral violation of the pedicle was seen in six screws (0.87%), whereas medial violation was seen in two screws (0.29%). The medial and lateral penetration of screws were significantly different between Groups A and B (p<.05). A pedicle breach occurred in 21 patients, and 15 of them underwent a revision surgery to correct the misplaced screw. Of these patients, 11 (13.6%) were in Group A, and 4 (3.4%) were in Group B (p=.0335). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we evaluated and clarified the diagnostic value of intraoperative fluoroscopy in both the lateral and AP imaging that have not yet been evaluated in any comparative study. We concluded that the intraoperative use of fluoroscopy, especially in the AP position, significantly decreases the risk of screw misplacement and the results are comparable with other advanced techniques.
背景:我们回顾性分析了2004年3月至2012年9月间接受手术的198例患者中1218枚椎弓根螺钉的准确性,术后采用计算机断层扫描(CT)。 目的:确定接受经椎弓根螺钉固定的患者中螺钉误置的发生率,术中采用侧位及侧位联合前后位(AP)透视。比较两组结果。 研究设计:胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入准确性的回顾性对比研究。 患者样本:样本包括198例连续接受经椎弓根螺钉固定的患者。 观察指标:通过术后CT扫描评估螺钉置入的准确性。当螺钉超过25%的长度位于椎弓根外时定义为误置。 方法:记录内固定置入的指征、影像学检查、患者人口统计学资料及再次手术率。仅在侧位透视辅助下将528枚螺钉(A组,n = 81)置入椎体,而690枚螺钉(B组,n = 117)在侧位透视辅助下置入,并通过AP透视检查螺钉的最终位置。 结果:共分析1218枚螺钉,其中962枚螺钉置于腰骶部,256枚螺钉置于胸部。根据术后CT扫描,27枚螺钉(2.2%)被确定为穿破椎弓根。其中19枚(3.6%)在A组,而8枚(1.16%)在B组。A组和B组的椎弓根穿破率有显著差异(p = 0.0052)。在A组,10枚螺钉(1.9%)出现椎弓根外侧穿破,而9枚螺钉(1.7%)出现内侧穿破。在B组,6枚螺钉(0.87%)出现椎弓根外侧穿破,而2枚螺钉(0.29%)出现内侧穿破。两组之间螺钉的内侧和外侧穿透情况有显著差异(p < 0.05)。21例患者出现椎弓根穿破,其中15例接受了翻修手术以纠正误置的螺钉。在这些患者中,11例(13.6%)在A组,4例(3.4%)在B组(p = 0.0335)。 结论:在本研究中,我们评估并阐明了术中侧位及AP位透视的诊断价值,此前尚无任何对比研究对此进行评估。我们得出结论,术中使用透视,尤其是在AP位,可显著降低螺钉误置的风险,其结果与其他先进技术相当。
Spine J. 2017-11-16
Int J Spine Surg. 2019-4-30
Int J Spine Surg. 2018-8-3
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018-1-1
Surg Neurol Int. 2015-6-25